|
Post by Figgles on Mar 25, 2018 19:04:52 GMT
Amen.
|
|
|
Post by Figgles on Mar 25, 2018 19:15:23 GMT
Nice. Excellent. yes. An important point. Great post SomeNothing.
|
|
|
Post by Figgles on Mar 25, 2018 19:19:36 GMT
Seriously? All of that happens in experience. You do the math. (hint: Nothing you can experience is Truth)
|
|
|
Post by Figgles on Mar 25, 2018 19:36:08 GMT
So does Self realization.
Self Realization reveals that all is unified, how could it not if it is revealed that there is no separation? However, those qualities that you experienced as real, while compelling indeed, are not Truth. If you come away with anything other than "reality is not comprehendible with mind" you've fell victim to the perils of the almighty CC experience and taken the experience as Truth.
Indeed, there are not two. But, Nor are there two avenues to seeing Truth. If quality is involved, then thought/mind/ideation is involved. Truth is not a thought/idea. Rather, it's the seeing through of thought/ideation. It's the absence, falling away of knowledge, not an addition of knowledge.
All knowing of quality is experiential...involves the presence of mind. Realization always hinges upon absence.
I have no problem with someone saying that reality is 'experienced as' being alive, vibrant, intelligent' but that's different from saying those qualities have been realized to be the Truth about reality.
|
|
Enigma
Super Duper Senior Member
Posts: 13,969
|
Post by Enigma on Mar 25, 2018 23:22:10 GMT
Yup. That's what all of us you've labelled as "solipsists." have been saying too. The question is misconceived and beyond a simple seeing that all experiential content, people included, arise within I am/existence and thus, have no known independent existence of their own, there are really no huge ramifications to seeing that all appearances are empty, in terms of how we go on to behave towards and engage with appearing people. You took what was meant to be a casual mention or aside to the larger seeing that all appearances are empty, and turned it into a federal case, because you just could not bear the idea that some were suggesting that appearing people might be nothing more than apparitional characters in what is the equivalent of a waking dream. The bottom line here is that either one sees that there is no separate, existent world 'out there' or he doesn't. Either one sees that the phenomenal world arises within I am/existence, or he doesn't. Clearly, you don't. And it's not just your vehement insistence that you somehow have certainty about appearances that are empty, but you also give it away in your views about the world. One who sees that the world arises within him, is not going to find himself compelled to try to create a new world-wide system of government, to heal/balance the world. Rather, he's going to be crystal clear that that kind of world, where 'systems' have the power to affect and cause such change, is non-existent...that really, It's all an inside job...that, The very idea of 'an existent world' is itself, a delusion. In response to Andy's comment, I'd say the idea that there may be other points of perception doesn't imply there may be separate others. The idea that there are no others addresses the illusion of separation, while points of perception are just 'windows on creation'.
|
|
Enigma
Super Duper Senior Member
Posts: 13,969
|
Post by Enigma on Mar 26, 2018 0:18:53 GMT
So does Self realization. Self Realization reveals that all is unified, how could it not if it is revealed that there is no separation? However, those qualities that you experienced as real, while compelling indeed, are not Truth. If you come away with anything other than "reality is not comprehendible with mind" you've fell victim to the perils of the almighty CC experience and taken the experience as Truth. Indeed, there are not two. But, Nor are there two avenues to seeing Truth. If quality is involved, then thought/mind/ideation is involved. Truth is not a thought/idea. Rather, it's the seeing through of thought/ideation. It's the absence, falling away of knowledge, not an addition of knowledge.
All knowing of quality is experiential...involves the presence of mind. Realization always hinges upon absence. I have no problem with someone saying that reality is 'experienced as' being alive, vibrant, intelligent' but that's different from saying those qualities have been realized to be the Truth about reality. Zaklee. Just got back from a squirrel satsang where this came up. I was saying all knowledge is formed using boundaries in the individuated mind, and prior to that formation there is no knowledge. Hencely, it's not really true that mind is not capable of understanding the truth. The truth is that there is no truth. When Marie saw that, I saw her mind stop, just for a moment. That was enough. It was a good day.
|
|
|
Post by Figgles on Mar 26, 2018 15:07:39 GMT
Yup. yes...well said. Cool.
|
|
|
Post by Figgles on Mar 28, 2018 15:08:17 GMT
"The other thing that I noticed was that I lost all my habitual certainties. Earlier I was sure of so many things, now I am sure of nothing. But I feel that I have lost nothing by not knowing, because all my knowledge was false."
Nisargadatta
|
|
|
Post by Figgles on Mar 28, 2018 16:15:26 GMT
"The other thing that I noticed was that I lost all my habitual certainties. Earlier I was sure of so many things, now I am sure of nothing. But I feel that I have lost nothing by not knowing, because all my knowledge was false." Nisargadatta Yes. This is one of the quotes that really changed the trajectory on this end. Not only with regard to encountering clarity, but in every day life. Yes...that seeing is a game changer for sure.
|
|
|
Post by Figgles on Mar 29, 2018 16:06:00 GMT
I wonder if you see all absence of certain knowledge, pertaining to ALL arising appearance then as 'an intellectual conclusion'? And if not, why have you specifically singled out 'appearing people'? To see that the only thing I can be certain about is "I am/existence" is not an intellectual conclusion. Just ask Reefs..he used to talk about that a lot...remember, back when he used to hound you to try to get you to answer the question "Do you exist"? How so? Realizing Oneness does not all of a sudden mean that certainty enters in regarding stuff that appears. Do you recall saying that 'all you can be certain of is "I exist"?' You were pretty adamant about it. When did that change? Why did it change? You were heading in the right direction and then you turned on your heels and started heading back to peep-land. And all because of a CC experience? See...just goes to show how problematic those things can really be. Sticky as hell, they are. A dude can be half-way out of the quick-sand and he has one of those and then he's right back down under again, fast asleep, dreaming he's awake.
|
|