krsnaraja
Super Duper Senior Member
Posts: 1,611
|
Post by krsnaraja on Dec 26, 2017 0:44:01 GMT
The idea of Self-Realization is that the body is a machine. The self/mind/intelligence is eternal. Once the body dies, exits the self/mind/intelligence. They will receive a corresponding body in the next life. The self-realized soul do not come back into this material world but goes home back to Godhead. Cosmic consciousness is perceiving the structure of the universe, the galaxies, stars and planets in it inhabited by beings other than humans. When I want to be situated in CC this is what I usually do. Watch movies that go cosmic.
|
|
krsnaraja
Super Duper Senior Member
Posts: 1,611
|
Post by krsnaraja on Dec 27, 2017 0:07:08 GMT
Self-realization occurs after lessons are learned. When we were infants, a toddler would not know the difference between hot cold until the infant is made to experience by letting him touch a lighted cigarette and grasp an ice cube. But the realization of that experience won`t occur if that toddler is afflicted with leprosy/Hansen`s disease. People need the experience to realize something. It maybe good and bad. But for one thing since there is no separateness of good and bad from a non-dual view, the result is hilarious. Seriously, killing is a crime. But from an executioner`s view, it is not. Robbing people is a crime but when government empties the people`s pockets with taxes, the deed is good for everybody? Brahma declared to his son, Narada, that this world is actually a dream, a phantasmagoria. So why pay attention to the details when in the end they wont count? When the terrorists on board the airplanes that where flying towards the Twin Towers in New York on September 11, 2001, they were enjoying the show. But the passengers were not. To them it was a nightmare. Things may seem real but the truth is they are unreal. A self-realize soul knows this.
|
|
|
Post by Figgles on Mar 8, 2018 19:51:51 GMT
As I see it, SR covers the whole gamut and all absent 'an experience.'
I don't see how one can lose the sense of person-hood, (of being a separate some-thing that exists within experience, that also experiences other stuff that exists separate and apart from me) and somehow fail to ALSO realize 'the infinite'.
The very way in which a particular CC experience is being upheld as equal to SR here, imo, only serves to drive home the point that any experience, regardless of how profound it may seem to be, might serve to lead one deeper into the dream instead of out of it.
Truth realization always has loss at it's core....from that, we might speak of knowing certain stuff, but it's always got that absence at it's helm. So long as one is talking about knowing stuff about experiential content, he's headed in the wrong direction.
it is very possible that a particular experience might go hand in hand with SR, but in the end, the experiential aspect of the realization has to be let go of.
|
|
|
Post by Figgles on Mar 8, 2018 20:47:05 GMT
As I see it, SR covers the whole gamut and all absent 'an experience.' I don't see how one can lose the sense of person-hood, (of being a separate some-thing that exists within experience, that also experiences other stuff that exists separate and apart from me) and somehow fail to ALSO realize 'the infinite'. The very way in which a particular CC experience is being upheld as equal to SR here, imo, only serves to drive home the point that any experience, regardless of how profound it may seem to be, might serve to lead one deeper into the dream instead of out of it. Truth realization always has loss at it's core....from that, we might speak of knowing certain stuff, but it's always got that absence at it's helm. So long as one is talking about knowing stuff about experiential content, he's headed in the wrong direction. it is very possible that a particular experience might go hand in hand with SR, but in the end, the experiential aspect of the realization has to be let go of. That's a terrific post, figs. I've had a few cc experiences through meditation. They're traps. Yes, they can be. AS I see it, that's what the "if you see the Buddha on the road, kill him" points to.....don't get hung up on the 'experience' of something, regardless of how compellingly super duperly awesome it seems to be. Ultimately, you have to move/see beyond experience if you want to know the Truth.
|
|
|
Post by Figgles on Mar 9, 2018 17:48:30 GMT
"Alive" in the same way that term is generally used? Seems to me you're falling into assigning qualities to that which defies such, and then into the false logic/extrapolation trap. To say that the one thingless thing that gives rise to all is 'alive/intelligent' is to use those terms, at best, in a metaphorical way....and at worst, to assign attribute to that which has none. If one has truly realized that one thingless thing, he has, after all, also seen that it is without quality, un-quantifiable, unable to be captured with words or any idea that a human mind could conjure up. It is beyond mind's grasp, can only be 'realized' and thus, pointed to. The terms 'alive/intelligent' are themselves then, merely pointers. When folks insist that the one thingness thing has certain attributes, qualities and that then, therefore, each and every singular appearance that arises within consciousness is necessarily 'alive, conscious, aware, intelligent,' clearly, pointers are getting licked. And herein lies the danger of upholding special, woo-woo 'experiences' as equal in importance, to realization.....the experiential aspects get mixed in, and thus, it becomes a sort of 'mixed-up' realization, vs. a pure, clear seeing. I'd go as far to say as well that undue talk about experiences surrounding SR in general can be problematic....I always find it kind of odd how some (supposedly SR) folks seem to hold so tightly to their 'realization stories/memories'....when really, that aspect of realization is pretty much irrelevant. Either one is presently awake/aware that he is noneother than the one thingness thing, or he's not. Fancy woo-woo stories about the experiential aspects surrounding how that seeing/knowing came to be, imo, mostly just muddy the waters. .....these days I am so clearly seeing that immersion within experience, within knowledge, is what keeps one asleep....thus, so long as mind is focused upon experience, a story, 'thingness', he's focused upon dream-stuff. And that includes the experiential aspects surrounding realization. In terms of SR, Nothing but the seeing through of previous delusions matters. And they have to be seen through to the point where they fall away....otherwise, we're talking about a conceptual understanding that is absent actual realization. The seeing through removes that which was obscuring the Truth...that which was already there, always is there, just waiting to be seen. So there really is no 'taking on' of knowledge....it's the removing of knowledge....that which was an obstacle to seeing Truth. It's important to see that not only is There no knowledge one needs to gain in order to wake up/to realize Self....but in fact, it is the belief that we know stuff that we actually do not know, cannot know, that keeps one anchored within experience/the dream.
|
|
Enigma
Super Duper Senior Member
Posts: 13,969
|
Post by Enigma on Mar 10, 2018 0:11:33 GMT
Self-realization occurs after lessons are learned. When we were infants, a toddler would not know the difference between hot cold until the infant is made to experience by letting him touch a lighted cigarette and grasp an ice cube. But the realization of that experience won`t occur if that toddler is afflicted with leprosy/Hansen`s disease. People need the experience to realize something. It maybe good and bad. But for one thing since there is no separateness of good and bad from a non-dual view, the result is hilarious. Seriously, killing is a crime. But from an executioner`s view, it is not. Robbing people is a crime but when government empties the people`s pockets with taxes, the deed is good for everybody? Brahma declared to his son, Narada, that this world is actually a dream, a phantasmagoria. So why pay attention to the details when in the end they wont count? When the terrorists on board the airplanes that where flying towards the Twin Towers in New York on September 11, 2001, they were enjoying the show. But the passengers were not. To them it was a nightmare. Things may seem real but the truth is they are unreal. A self-realize soul knows this. Won't count for what? I ask because I seem to be exploring the idea that nothing matters until it can be seen as 'real' based on an arbitrary definition of real. Seems like it's the experience that matters.
|
|
Enigma
Super Duper Senior Member
Posts: 13,969
|
Post by Enigma on Mar 10, 2018 0:31:53 GMT
Figgles: Exactly. And I say all this having actually had numerous CC experiences/spiritual experiences. You're right.....if it's an experience (has content that can be talked about, described), it absolutely involves or even hinges upon, a 'mind state.'...... and, most importantly, it can and so often is a huge distraction away from "Truth".....attention gets overly captured....which happens so easily, more often than not where CC experiences are concerned, specifically because it's an experience that stands out as 'special.' I would say there's a distinct 'purity' or 'groundedness' that comes across, as you espouse your wisdom, that likely comes from the absence of, the fact that, you have not had that particular distraction. (sorry E, I think I edited your post instead of quoted.... )
|
|
Enigma
Super Duper Senior Member
Posts: 13,969
|
Post by Enigma on Mar 10, 2018 0:35:07 GMT
As I see it, SR covers the whole gamut and all absent 'an experience.' I don't see how one can lose the sense of person-hood, (of being a separate some-thing that exists within experience, that also experiences other stuff that exists separate and apart from me) and somehow fail to ALSO realize 'the infinite'. The very way in which a particular CC experience is being upheld as equal to SR here, imo, only serves to drive home the point that any experience, regardless of how profound it may seem to be, might serve to lead one deeper into the dream instead of out of it. Truth realization always has loss at it's core....from that, we might speak of knowing certain stuff, but it's always got that absence at it's helm. So long as one is talking about knowing stuff about experiential content, he's headed in the wrong direction. it is very possible that a particular experience might go hand in hand with SR, but in the end, the experiential aspect of the realization has to be let go of. That's a terrific post, figs. I've had a few cc experiences through meditation. They're traps. I think you're the first person I've ever talked to who escaped.
|
|
Enigma
Super Duper Senior Member
Posts: 13,969
|
Post by Enigma on Mar 10, 2018 0:37:10 GMT
Yes, they can be. AS I see it, that's what the "if you see the Buddha on the road, kill him" points to.....don't get hung up on the 'experience' of something, regardless of how compellingly super duperly awesome it seems to be. Ultimately, you have to move/see beyond experience if you want to know the Truth. Good pointers, All. It just one day dawned on this end that the one who experiences samadhi, the one who experiences higher states of con- sciousness, has to go, has to be transcended, eliminated. Going back the way I came made me realize I came into this experience open-hearted and empty. Awake. I have always been awake. And aware. So that means you might be a rock.
|
|
Enigma
Super Duper Senior Member
Posts: 13,969
|
Post by Enigma on Mar 10, 2018 0:47:55 GMT
"Alive" in the same way that term is generally used? Seems to me you're falling into assigning qualities to that which defies such, and then into the false logic/extrapolation trap. To say that the one thingless thing that gives rise to all is 'alive/intelligent' is to use those terms, at best, in a metaphorical way....and at worst, to assign attribute to that which has none. If one has truly realized that one thingless thing, he has, after all, also seen that it is without quality, un-quantifiable, unable to be captured with words or any idea that a human mind could conjure up. It is beyond mind's grasp, can only be 'realized' and thus, pointed to. The terms 'alive/intelligent' are themselves then, merely pointers. When folks insist that the one thingness thing has certain attributes, qualities and that then, therefore, each and every singular appearance that arises within consciousness is necessarily 'alive, conscious, aware, intelligent,' clearly, pointers are getting licked. And herein lies the danger of upholding special, woo-woo 'experiences' as equal in importance, to realization.....the experiential aspects get mixed in, and thus, it becomes a sort of 'mixed-up' realization, vs. a pure, clear seeing. I'd go as far to say as well that undue talk about experiences surrounding SR in general can be problematic....I always find it kind of odd how some (supposedly SR) folks seem to hold so tightly to their 'realization stories/memories'....when really, that aspect of realization is pretty much irrelevant. Either one is presently awake/aware that he is noneother than the one thingness thing, or he's not. Fancy woo-woo stories about the experiential aspects surrounding how that seeing/knowing came to be, imo, mostly just muddy the waters. .... .these days I am so clearly seeing that immersion within experience, within knowledge, is what keeps one asleep....thus, so long as mind is focused upon experience, a story, 'thingness', he's focused upon dream-stuff. And that includes the experiential aspects surrounding realization.
In terms of SR, Nothing but the seeing through of previous delusions matters. And they have to be seen through to the point where they fall away....otherwise, we're talking about a conceptual understanding that is absent actual realization. The seeing through removes that which was obscuring the Truth...that which was already there, always is there, just waiting to be seen. So there really is no 'taking on' of knowledge....it's the removing of knowledge....that which was an obstacle to seeing Truth.
It's important to see that not only is There no knowledge one needs to gain in order to wake up/to realize Self....but in fact, it is the belief that we know stuff that we actually do not know, cannot know, that keeps one anchored within experience/the dream. Well said.
|
|