|
Post by Figgles on May 31, 2022 6:25:38 GMT
Sincerity is everything when it comes to the discussions on these forums, to Truth-talk in general. Absent a genuine, and sincere interest in getting to the Truth, we have all shades of new agey sorts of musings going on.....deep dives into minding, masquerading as a quest for Truth.
perfect example below...
ST used to be a venue where Truth-talk was the main interest, but now it seems New Age talk/self help/psychology and science, oddly, has taken over.
Anyway, this is thread to talk about what true sincerity is when it comes to seeking for Truth....I think it's an important point and thus, deserves it's own thread.
|
|
|
Post by Figgles on May 31, 2022 6:35:43 GMT
Right!
And spending way more time talking about those theories....spinning those conceptual stories that attempt to explain that which you say is known to ultimately defy such, does seem to indicate a loss of sight of 'the big picture.'
Reefs-of-yesteryear used to be only interested in the Truth, but now seems to have fallen back asleep and conceptual stories/theories seem to have replaced "big picture" seeing.
Just because LOA seemingly covers all grounds and explains things in a way that satisfies mind, does not equal it being Truth.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 31, 2022 6:56:16 GMT
Sincerity is everything when it comes to the discussions on these forums, to Truth-talk in general. Absent a genuine, and sincere interest in getting to the Truth, we have all shades of new agey sorts of musings going on.....deep dives into minding, masquerading as a quest for Truth. perfect example below... ST used to be a venue where Truth-talk was the main interest, but now it seems New Age talk/self help/psychology and science, oddly, has taken over. Anyway, this is thread to talk about what true sincerity is when it comes to seeking for Truth....I think it's an important point and thus, deserves it's own thread. So now you are admitting there is volition to be sincere and to seek the truth.
|
|
|
Post by Figgles on May 31, 2022 6:58:12 GMT
Sincerity is everything when it comes to the discussions on these forums, to Truth-talk in general. Absent a genuine, and sincere interest in getting to the Truth, we have all shades of new agey sorts of musings going on.....deep dives into minding, masquerading as a quest for Truth. perfect example below... ST used to be a venue where Truth-talk was the main interest, but now it seems New Age talk/self help/psychology and science, oddly, has taken over. Anyway, this is thread to talk about what true sincerity is when it comes to seeking for Truth....I think it's an important point and thus, deserves it's own thread. So now you are admitting there is volition to be sincere and to seek the truth. Oh God no. "Sincerity" is not in the hands of a person. It's either here, or it's not. There is no choosing whether or not to BE sincere. Only the presence of actual interest/honesty/earnestness will do.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 31, 2022 7:01:43 GMT
So now you are admitting there is volition to be sincere and to seek the truth. Oh God no. "Sincerity" is not in the hands of a person. It's either here, or it's not. There is no choosing whether or not to BE sincere. Only the presence of actual interest/honesty/earnestness will do. Okay that's fine. I was getting worried for a moment that there might be someone who is getting sincere. What a relief to no one.
|
|
|
Post by Figgles on May 31, 2022 7:05:46 GMT
Oh God no. "Sincerity" is not in the hands of a person. It's either here, or it's not. There is no choosing whether or not to BE sincere. Only the presence of actual interest/honesty/earnestness will do. Okay that's fine. I was getting worried for a moment that there might be someone who is getting sincere. What a relief to no one. Now you're doing the Jeff Foster, Brown-bear thing...denying the relative...denying appearance. Not necessary. Relief is a facet of experience...and the Satchi character being relieved, is an appearance within that....no need to deny such. To acknowledge the arising of relief, but then to deny that there's an experienced me character who feels relief, is to mix contexts...deny the relative.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 31, 2022 7:07:52 GMT
Okay that's fine. I was getting worried for a moment that there might be someone who is getting sincere. What a relief to no one. Now you're doing the Jeff Foster, Brown-bear thing...denying the relative...denying appearance. Not necessary. Relief is a facet of experience...and the Satchi character being relieved, is an appearance within that....no need to deny such. To acknowledge the arising of relief, but then to deny that there's an experienced me character who feels relief, is to mix contexts...deny the relative. If by referring to you as you I'm referring to you as a person then how are you using the word Sachi to refer to satchi. What is this Satchi you seem to be quoting. Is that the same as you. Hey you satchi.
|
|
|
Post by Figgles on May 31, 2022 7:11:05 GMT
Now you're doing the Jeff Foster, Brown-bear thing...denying the relative...denying appearance. Not necessary. Relief is a facet of experience...and the Satchi character being relieved, is an appearance within that....no need to deny such. To acknowledge the arising of relief, but then to deny that there's an experienced me character who feels relief, is to mix contexts...deny the relative. If by referring to you as you I'm referring to you as a person then how are you using the word Sachi to refer to satchi. What is this Satchi you seem to be quoting. Is that the same as you. Hey you satchi. Anything at all that is a facet of experience is appearance only. Both Figgles and Stach are appearances within the story. All appearances are non-separate arisings/expressions to/within awareness.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 31, 2022 7:11:57 GMT
Now you're doing the Jeff Foster, Brown-bear thing...denying the relative...denying appearance. Not necessary. No that's what you are doing otherwise you wouldn't have said that I'm referring to you as the personal when I refer to appearances appearing to you. But in your reply here you're telling a different story. There's no need to deny the relative you say. Okay. So tell me who these appearances are appearing to.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 31, 2022 7:13:49 GMT
If by referring to you as you I'm referring to you as a person then how are you using the word Sachi to refer to satchi. What is this Satchi you seem to be quoting. Is that the same as you. Hey you satchi. Anything at all that is a facet of experience is appearance only. Both Figgles and Stach are appearances within the story. All appearances are non-separate arisings/expressions to/within awareness. They're not appearing to the story they are appearing to you. Why are you so afraid to say that, that they appear to YOU.
|
|