Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 19, 2021 20:15:14 GMT
all because I chose the word callous don't hold me to it.. I could pick another Not just that. It's that you won't often debate the objective points that could be debated. You picked out a 'morality' point. did not pick the word for the morality aspect.. that's for fucking sure
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 19, 2021 20:18:21 GMT
all because I chose the word callous don't hold me to it.. I could pick another Not just that. It's that you won't often debate the objective points that could be debated. You picked out a 'morality' point. just because I generally won't don't think that I can't most things don't hold my interest for very long
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 19, 2021 20:21:34 GMT
but sure whatever.. what position am I supposed to back up with notes and clips?
|
|
|
Post by Figgles on Jul 19, 2021 20:54:15 GMT
I think the current tally is 608k dead in America, and 7 million worldwide (and rising). How many more would need to die for you to stop using that callous data point? 4 million with covid. The UK is known to be one of the hardest hit countries, right? And it's true (from my understanding) that a lot of people have died with covid....100K+ But, statistical analysis of the UK’s National Office for Statistics (ONS) ''excess death rates from 1999 to the end of 2020'' reveals that FIVE of those years showed higher rates of mortality than the year of 2020. I don't remember any of those years being of any significance. I'd be curious to see how America compares in this regard too. In terms of 'callousness', why do we callously ignore the 9 million that die of hunger every year? Or the millions that die from obesity related illness? Precisely. The hypocrisy in terms of the magnitude of importance that was/is assigned to Covid death over all other kinds/causes of death is mind-bogglingly ridiculous. Someone dies of cancer...a kid dies of overdose, a car crash perhaps, and ya just know there's some masked up ninny somewhere commenting, 'as least it wasn't Covid.'
|
|
|
Post by Figgles on Jul 19, 2021 20:59:39 GMT
I ignore pleas for money from 'groups'. But I'd be happy to give you a meal or two. I was just pointing out that you were virtue signalling (faux morality), that's all. Yup. One of my first thoughts when I heard the gov. would be paying folks to stay home...and how all businesses would have to spend money re-vamping with plastic partitions, arrows, signs, etc, etc, ....all the money spent on masks and all other craziness, was; imagine if all the money spent on that crap had been funnelled directly to the neediest and poorest/hungriest...the fact that gov. could just hand out money like that so freely, most certainly alerted me to the fact that all along, countries DID have enough funds to make sure no one ever goes hungry or without shelter.
|
|
|
Post by Figgles on Jul 19, 2021 21:05:08 GMT
Not just that. It's that you won't often debate the objective points that could be debated. You picked out a 'morality' point. just because I generally won't don't think that I can't most things don't hold my interest for very long Do you or don't you want to converse about your contrarian opinion? You came here seemingly looking to converse/debate the issues...yes....no?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 19, 2021 21:06:22 GMT
I was just pointing out that you were virtue signalling (faux morality), that's all. Yup. One of my first thoughts when I heard the gov. would be paying folks to stay home...and how all businesses would have to spend money re-vamping with plastic partitions, arrows, signs, etc, etc, ....all the money spent on masks and all other craziness, was; imagine if all the money spent on that crap had been funnelled directly to the neediest and poorest/hungriest...the fact that gov. could just hand out money like that so freely, most certainly alerted me to the fact that all along, countries DID have enough funds to make sure no one ever goes hungry or without shelter. but they don't 'have the money'.. they have to first pass legislation which authorizes however much money they need then the treasury department sells bonds to raise it.. something Joe Manchin would agree to whatever it was..
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 19, 2021 21:08:01 GMT
just because I generally won't don't think that I can't most things don't hold my interest for very long Do you or don't you want to converse about your contrarian opinion? You came here seemingly looking to converse/debate the issues...yes....no? not really, I just lobbed that out there.. and then see what happens and for another reason I'm sure I'd never say
|
|
|
Post by Figgles on Jul 19, 2021 21:24:15 GMT
Do you or don't you want to converse about your contrarian opinion? You came here seemingly looking to converse/debate the issues...yes....no? not really, I just lobbed that out there.. and then see what happens and for another reason I'm sure I'd never say Oooookay.. From where I sit it appears that you waffle wildly between wanting very much to talk about it in one moment, to kind of stick it a bit to those who aren't lining up to get vaxxed and such, and then in the next moment, you back away, claiming you're able to just shrug it all off.... not all that interested in any of it after all. I'd advise a little self-inquiry into that.
|
|
|
Post by Figgles on Jul 19, 2021 21:54:08 GMT
On one hand, I'm concerned by the extremity of your position, which suggests you may have been radicalized by the media On the other hand, I'm impressed that your technical skills enabled you to carry a quote from a conversation on the other forum, onto this forum. Well, on one hand, I could give a fuck whether the dopes refuse the shot or not But their stupidity is dragging this whole fucking thing out.. so fuck themAnd two, copy and paste is like internet 1.0 Looks like you've reeled things in a tad since this post.
|
|