Post by Andrew on Jul 19, 2021 12:25:49 GMT
Jul 19, 2021 10:36:13 GMT @farmer said:
(1) Do you know what VAERS is? If not, if this is the first time you are hearing about it, then why do you think that is?
(2) None of the vax are approved by the FDA in the same sense that other vaccines have been, which involve processes that take years. The approval is on an emergency basis, with the understanding that these vax are experimental.
(3) The mRNA technology is novel, in terms of deployment, and even relatively novel in terms of when it was first invented.
(4) The manufacturers, distributors and administrators of the vax have been granted sweeping and unprecedented immunity from civil liabilities that might arise from the effects of taking it.
(5) A significant % of reported new covid cases are among the jabbed.
(6) There are credible medical professionals and scientists backed with data that claim treatment of covid with alternatives such as ivermectine is highly effective.
(7) The CDC has since had to issue several warnings about potential side effects for various groups, including pregnant women, children, young people who have already had covid and adolescent males between certain ages (I think between 16-19, but might be wront). The effects in question differ among those groups.
(8) The stats on survival rate are over 99.97% or thereabouts .. why is there such attention on this cause of death that didn't prove to be even a small fraction of what was predicted, and why should someone pollute their body with a vaccine as a precaution against such a low risk?
(9) The media/tech censorship of these simple facts along with the nine new vax-billionares would suggest that the push to vaccinate everyone and the rather over-emotional characterization of the vax-hesitant including various forms of ridicule and scorn isn't motivated by an interest in public health and well being. That's not to say that everyone involved in the push is cynical - I'm sure most of them actually believe that vaxing the population is a valid public health goal. But, it would seem from these other factors that there is more than just a good intention involved. Whether those doing the jacovidian pushing are conscious of that, or not.
How many more would need to die for you to stop using that callous data point?
The UK is known to be one of the hardest hit countries, right? And it's true (from my understanding) that a lot of people have died with covid....100K+
But, statistical analysis of the UK’s National Office for Statistics (ONS) ''excess death rates from 1999 to the end of 2020'' reveals that FIVE of those years showed higher rates of mortality than the year of 2020. I don't remember any of those years being of any significance.
I'd be curious to see how America compares in this regard too.
In terms of 'callousness', why do we callously ignore the 9 million that die of hunger every year? Or the millions that die from obesity related illness?