|
Post by Figgles on Apr 18, 2021 23:56:44 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Figgles on Apr 19, 2021 0:15:15 GMT
And of course, hand in glove with the term "Kensho" comes "Cosmic Consciousness Experience." What is it exactly? Does it have anything to do with nondual pointers to Truth..with awakening TO the dream vs. merely waking up to the consensus trance?
A good example of a conceptualized view of nonduality below...Depak.... where he tries to straddle the lines between the mystical and Nonduality (but necessarily and ultimately fails, as nonduality...the seeing through of separation and the separate, volition person, actually have nothing to do with mystical experience, however compelling and awe-inspiring it may be.)
Deepak is actually far more a "New Ager" than a Nonduality teacher. I still love the way he expresses though....and the inner calm that underscores that expression is undeniable.
A stellar example I'd say, of a 'mature human adult'....one who lives consciously, highly aware of WIBIGO, who is deeply into mysticism, can look a lot like one who is awake to the dream...the giveaway is how he flips from seemingly pointing, and in the same breath, then speaking about concepts like reincarnation without skipping a beat...giving equal credence to both.
|
|
Esponja
Super Duper Senior Member
Posts: 1,742
|
Post by Esponja on Apr 19, 2021 1:41:32 GMT
And of course, hand in glove with the term "Kensho" comes "Cosmic Consciousness Experience." What is it exactly? Does it have anything to do with nondual pointers to Truth..with awakening TO the dream vs. merely waking up to the consensus trance? A good example of a conceptualized view of nonduality below...Depak.... where he tries to straddle the lines between the mystical and Nonduality (but necessarily and ultimately fails, as nonduality...the seeing through of separation and the separate, volition person, actually have nothing to do with mystical experience, however compelling and awe-inspiring it may be.) Deepak is actually far more a "New Ager" than a Nonduality teacher. I still love the way he expresses though....and the inner calm that underscores that expression is undeniable. A stellar example I'd say, of a 'mature human adult'....one who lives consciously, highly aware of WIBIGO, who is deeply into mysticism, can look a lot like one who is awake to the dream...the giveaway is how he flips from seemingly pointing, and in the same breath, then speaking about concepts like reincarnation without skipping a beat...giving equal credence to both. Will take a look.
|
|
|
Post by Figgles on Jun 28, 2021 17:40:53 GMT
A bump for this article that does a great job of describing Kensho/CC and the importance of not becoming attached to such experience. Fact is, these types of experiences ARE highly attractive...very, very sticky. If we're talking Truth, best really to keep talk about such experiences more on the down low rather than touting them as importantly related to SR. ZD for one, posits his CC/Kensho as 'part of' Self Realization...even goes further to suggest 'causal to.' And that's just not so. What happens is that in a moment where the SVP 'slips' from the forefront, is momentarily not there, an experience arises to represent that absence...it's mind rushing in to try to make sense of the absence, and of course, it cannot, because there is no-thing conceptual there for it to grasp. The moment of seeing through is primary and then mind's concoction of a dream/story to try to represent that, is secondary, not the other way around as ZD and Reefs suggest.
|
|
|
Post by Figgles on Jun 28, 2021 21:00:41 GMT
That "extra insight" added upon an actual seeing through/absence of separation, if mistaken as Truth, is nothing more than a trip straight back into the conceptual dream.
In my opinion, you rely far too heavily upon what others have described, stories of Zen masters, etc, vs. your own authority. Speak from what YOU see....from what YOU know directly to be Truth, rather than always trying to augment your position with the descriptions of those you hold to be in authority.
In true awakening it would be seen that those sensory events were but mere correlates and not actually causal triggers after all. And that IF there was a seeing through of SVP, hand in hand with the 'event' that that too, was not caused by or causal to the CC/Kensho, but rather, the woo-woo experience was just mind intervening to try to make sense of a momentary absence of the SVP....which I believe you have have actually admitted yourself is completely acausal...no path or process that causes that seeing through.
Why? So more seekers can get hung up having awe-inspiring, amazing experiences that they then conflate with SR? I think you admitted several times while sharing your CC/Kensho story that you did indeed become attached to the experience itself and went about for a while seeking and striving to have another...?
|
|
|
Post by Figgles on Jun 29, 2021 21:23:22 GMT
Yes, Because, ultimately, when it comes to SR/waking up, there is NO actual causal path, regardless of an experience prior to awakening of there being a path/journey of sorts. Surely not 'valuable' in terms of becoming closer or farther to waking up. If something valuable is learned from reading about the experiences of others, then we are not talking about awakening but rather, a move to try to improve the dream-scape. Experience does not cause SR. The experiences of others have nothing to offer in terms of making you more likely to awaken. Truth lies 'beyond' experience. Why is it helpful to learn about activities that are 'correlated with' waking up? Seems you don't understand what 'correlate only' means...or that you infuse 'correlation' with some 'causal' powers there ZD. Correlated does not mean causal. SR is acausal. No path, no process ensures SR and in many cases, paths and processes further entrench the idea of doership...of the seeker...thus, OF 'seeking' itself....anyone who is entrenched in the idea that his practice is bringing him closer to SR is deluded. The very fact of seeking/engaging in a practice to get rid of the seeker is a nonsense.
|
|
|
Post by Figgles on Jun 29, 2021 21:33:33 GMT
Precisely.
Are you kidding? Your whole story about the importance of having a CC/Kensho so that a sense of awe...reverence...hubris...aliveness.. accompanies the seeing through of separation has nothing BUT the idea of person/in the story 'gain' to it.
The fact that you think SR is incomplete if one does not have a CC/Kensho experience demonstrates just how much the idea of 'gain' still plays into your ontology.
You exemplify why it is so important to see the entirety of perceivables as empty appearance only....you exemplify how subtle and sneaky the SVP delusion can be....the very sense of 'not being an SVP' but being connected and unity with the universe, is a big red flag. A sense of not being an SVP is of course a very different thing than an actual 'absence' of an SVP.
|
|
|
Post by Figgles on Jul 11, 2021 18:04:46 GMT
I wonder....At what point did you change your opinion about Segal's case? Reef's of yesteryear was not only skeptical, but seeming very confident in dismissing her account as complete woo-woo nonsense;
I for one have had (& continue to have!) many CC/Kensho's, including that key point of non-locality of perception, starting from the time I was quite young. The difference between you and I though is that I didn't come away ascribing (T)ruth to them.
You continue to insist that I simply have no reference for "Kensho/CC" and that's why I am not in agreement with you. CC/Kensho's are really not that rare.....spiritual circles are rife with sharing of these types of experiences and the wise amidst those circles continue to admonish, don't get attached/hung up on the sense of awe or as ZD described, you will spend years chasing after another CC/Kensho, mistaking such for the ultimate awakening. It's not.
I wonder too when you changed your mind about what constitutes realization? Just one of a multitude of your past posts below where you clearly denote 'realization' to be a loss/abence;
|
|
|
Post by Figgles on Jul 11, 2021 19:50:29 GMT
What I've noticed with your repeated accounts of your big CC ZD, is that the description and importance ascribed to it, has morphed considerably over time, with each relaying of it, which actually is quite classic when it comes to 'mind-blowing' CC/Kenshos or any woo-woo mystical experience. This below, was your 1st description of it....your first post on ST actually, by the look of it...which is kind of neat...enjoyed reading it! (2009...?) What stands out though, is that at that time you did not ascribe near as much importance to the initial CC/Kensho as you did the supposed seeing through of the SVP that you describe at the end of your post. And....interesting that in this first relaying of your CC, you don't refer to the disappearance of the SVP, or non-locality of perception per se, but rather, you say that you had an "out of body experience." Which I think both you and Reefs have denoted to be something entirely different than a "non-local perspective." In some of your subsequent posts, you also went on to describe how the initial CC/Kensho left you with a craving/seeking due to the 'awe'...thus, if you were 'serving' anything at that point, seems you were 'serving' the desire to replicate that experience and the awesome/beautiful feelings you felt, vs. serving Truth. There's a world of difference between the two. Curios too ZD.... you on one hand constantly reinforce the fact that post SR, you continue to live an "ordinary" life...nothing special...but then on the other hand, more recently, you place strong importance on the fact that you apparently live with an abiding sense of awe and reverence and continually 'bow down' in awe to THIS....which by the very fact that you express a sense of something lacking in those who you suggest don't have CC/Kensho induced awe/reverence for life, suggests that you don't consider that awe/bowing to be 'ordinary/common' at all.
It just seems the harder you've dug in your heels on this argument that your CC seeing that all things/people/objects are alive, conscious, perceiving, experiencing, the more your story keeps changing in defence of that position. Just like Reefs, your present posts often contradict things you were very firm on in the past. And really, that's what happens when one is more intent on defending their story than on Truth/clarity itself. Indeed. But, isn't that 'non-locality of perception' THE shift...THE hallmark of abiding SR? Once the SVP has been seen through, perception is after all, no longer tied to an appearing 'perceiver.' Seeing/awareness is now 'beyond' the realm of appearance. That's what SR IS! A profound shift in locus of seeing. The CC/Kensho version of 'non-locality of perception' though, with all it's woo-woo content, is conceptual in comparison to the abiding shift of SR....the abiding shift in seeing that is SR, itself, is not conceptual at all....it really does hinge upon an absence/seeing through of the separate, volitional person, that previously was mis-taken to be the source of perception. A Kensho/CC where the SVP "seemingly," temporarily/momentarily, takes a hike, is different from SR...in CC, there are still very much remnants of the SVP in play, even in the sense of 'non-locality' of seeing. It seems like there's no me, only in comparison to how the world is ordinarily experienced. It is precisely that remnant of SVP (continued identification with a me) that is responsible for the awe-some sense of 'experiencing' from/AS all things. In the temporary lifting of abject, full-out SVP (which is not 'really' the full absence of SVP as that requires realization/seeing through) there is still very much identification with the phenomenal in play....because the SVP has not 'actually' been seen through.
Mind hi-jacked the temporary absence of full-out SVP and turned it into an experience whereby identity merges with everything that appears. As awe-inspiring at that is, it's not Truth but rather, mind having it's way with the temporary SVP absence.When all identification ceases, it becomes clear that objects are not source of perception and never were. Rather, all perceivables arise within/to that which abides. The sense of a body/mind THAT gives rise to perception is an illusion/delusion that gets seen through in SR.
|
|
|
Post by Figgles on Jul 11, 2021 22:23:26 GMT
True freedom requires the sincere willingness to relinquish and accept, as empty-appearance-only, even those most special, beautiful, awe and bliss inspiring knowings 'about' THIS....even those most special and amazing recounts of past mind-blowing experiences... Truth lies beyond all acquired knowledge.
When there is willingness to let go of the most sacred of thoughts, ideas, memories about the appearing world, that is evidence that ego has loosened it's grip....thus, evidence of an auspiciousness where SR is concerned.
If you find yourself defending any particular idea regarding creation, how or why experience unfolds as it does, ideas about energies or fields that lie existent beneath that which is 'normally' perceived, in finding/seeing that interest in defending, you now have a perfect focus for inquiry.
The question 'what do I know for certain,' goes hand in hand with 'how do I know something for certain'? You know existence/Being as it's undeniably, self evident in THIS present moment...as the ground to all that appears, and you know an appearance is appearing, If/when an appearance is appearing "imminently." beyond that, there is no-thing about appearances to know....they, there entire realm of appearance is empty and devoid of Truth.
|
|