Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 1, 2017 8:18:06 GMT
This is where I find very strong problem there. Your peace of being is something different from what's happening out there?To the second bolder line : I believe you misunderstood the word 'Create', but it's okay. The argument is about witnessing here. It's very clear that we are not creating our thought/perception, we are just witnessing our thought/perception, So we both agree that we do not have freewill, Or do you want to argue with me that we have freewill?(I hope you are with me here so there is no need of argument in this place). Since we are not creating what's appearing to us, we are the silent witness behind the scene, agree?You say anything could happen outside but that need not to pull you into the negativity, So what's happening outside is independent of your consciousness, You are ONLY looking at those happenings. Right? The Peace of being is not separate from what's happening in circumstance, but nor is it tied to it, or attached to it. It can be seen, all of it, to be just what's happening...Being, the circumstances that arise, to the feelings about those circumstances. But when the peace of being is known, it is also seen that joy/bliss/well being/peace, is not tied to circumstances. Keep in mind, 'not tied to', does not equal, 'separated from.' It just means that joy can arise independent of what's appearing. There is indeed a distinction that is made between appearances and being, but distinction does not = separation. yes, I think we're in agreement here.Not independent of consciousness...perhaps best said, independent of attachment/need'. You can still see circumstance, and even denote it as 'unwanted', but just because it may not align with wanted, does not mean that the clouds must necessarily roll in to obscure the peace and joy of simple, unfettered being. There's just a point where the joy of being prevails, and regardless of what life is dishing up, you're ok. You are placing yourself to be a looker to the given situation, So something is happening out there and you are looking at that. You are saying that what's happening out there is not affecting you. I am saying what's happening out there is to define your feeling, that's not independent from your perception, you are creating that. Sometimes If you happened to meet with the situation where you perceive a terrific situation but you are untouched by that , then that's what you are creating(illusion). Soon watch out you will face the situation where you would be pulled into the situation that define your feeling soon. I know ZD,Satch,someNOTHING will support you, but that's not the truth. My point is, what's happening outside is just we are creating. I am creating Reefs and his wrong beliefs are part of the game, he has to confirm the reality so he would never see the truth! My famous statement is, 'Alfio goes Reefs comes'. So he can't reach the truth, yes he never will. If you consider all are one and everything is one single movement of the universe, then awakening of one individual will put others into the illusionary state, that's way universe moves, whether people are agreeing with my idea of not, that's what the truth is! So we continue to dream, I don't believe that any other purpose in this world except the awakening !
|
|
|
Post by Figgles on May 1, 2017 15:33:05 GMT
The Peace of being is not separate from what's happening in circumstance, but nor is it tied to it, or attached to it. It can be seen, all of it, to be just what's happening...Being, the circumstances that arise, to the feelings about those circumstances. But when the peace of being is known, it is also seen that joy/bliss/well being/peace, is not tied to circumstances. Keep in mind, 'not tied to', does not equal, 'separated from.' It just means that joy can arise independent of what's appearing. There is indeed a distinction that is made between appearances and being, but distinction does not = separation. yes, I think we're in agreement here.Not independent of consciousness...perhaps best said, independent of attachment/need'. You can still see circumstance, and even denote it as 'unwanted', but just because it may not align with wanted, does not mean that the clouds must necessarily roll in to obscure the peace and joy of simple, unfettered being. There's just a point where the joy of being prevails, and regardless of what life is dishing up, you're ok. You are placing yourself to be a looker to the given situation, So something is happening out there and you are looking at that. You are saying that what's happening out there is not affecting you. I am saying what's happening out there is to define your feeling, that's not independent from your perception, you are creating that. Sometimes If you happened to meet with the situation where you perceive a terrific situation but you are untouched by that , then that's what you are creating(illusion). Soon watch out you will face the situation where you would be pulled into the situation that define your feeling soon. I know ZD,Satch,someNOTHING will support you, but that's not the truth. My point is, what's happening outside is just we are creating. I am creating Reefs and his wrong beliefs are part of the game, he has to confirm the reality so he would never see the truth! My famous statement is, 'Alfio goes Reefs comes'. So he can't reach the truth, yes he never will. If you consider all are one and everything is one single movement of the universe, then awakening of one individual will put others into the illusionary state, that's way universe moves, whether people are agreeing with my idea of not, that's what the truth is! So we continue to dream, I don't believe that any other purpose in this world except the awakening ! You are inferring 'inner vs. outer' in my words, but there is no such division in what I am saying. Just because I remain unattached to a particular outcome, does not mean that I necessarily experience the circumstances themselves to be 'out' there somewhere, in relation to an 'in here.' Again, a differentiation (not separation) between Being and appearance can be seen. But you see that too, and this is clearly evidenced in your insistence that we cannot know whether those that appear to us are figment or actual perceiver....right? Does that distinction between Being and that which appears, necessarily = separation....or inner vs. outer? I don't see that it does. And I am not suggesting that at any time one becomes completely 'untouched' by all circumstance, but rather, absent attachment to outcomes, equanimity of feelings/emotions is the case. Thus, when something unwanted happens...a job loss....relationship fails.....loved one dies...etc, sadness may still arise, but with the bliss of Being right there, abidingly underscoring it, it has no depth or staying power. It arises and falls, and has no power to take you down into the dregs of despair. What do you make of those spiritual teachers who speak of a state of being that is rife with equanimity? Are you saying that one who has experienced years of emotional equanimity has simply not had the specific experience arise that would trigger his misery/despair?...and that because he has been emotionally balanced for so long, at some point, things must swing the other direction, and he is absolutely, necessarily in for a doozy of a circumstance, that will necessarily trigger deep, negative emotions?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 1, 2017 17:16:05 GMT
You are placing yourself to be a looker to the given situation, So something is happening out there and you are looking at that. You are saying that what's happening out there is not affecting you. I am saying what's happening out there is to define your feeling, that's not independent from your perception, you are creating that. Sometimes If you happened to meet with the situation where you perceive a terrific situation but you are untouched by that , then that's what you are creating(illusion). Soon watch out you will face the situation where you would be pulled into the situation that define your feeling soon. I know ZD,Satch,someNOTHING will support you, but that's not the truth. My point is, what's happening outside is just we are creating. I am creating Reefs and his wrong beliefs are part of the game, he has to confirm the reality so he would never see the truth! My famous statement is, 'Alfio goes Reefs comes'. So he can't reach the truth, yes he never will. If you consider all are one and everything is one single movement of the universe, then awakening of one individual will put others into the illusionary state, that's way universe moves, whether people are agreeing with my idea of not, that's what the truth is! So we continue to dream, I don't believe that any other purpose in this world except the awakening ! You are inferring 'inner vs. outer' in my words, but there is no such division in what I am saying. Just because I remain unattached to a particular outcome, does not mean that I necessarily experience the circumstances themselves to be 'out' there somewhere, in relation to an 'in here.' A little difference here, you are putting yourself in a position of witness, So anything could happen infront of your eyes but still you say you remain untouched, how? I don't understand! If somebody rapes a girl, your peace will not be distracted? No, that's not the separation we have been talking about. We are talking about the association between the perceiver and perceived. Condition1 : You are the witness so you are perceiving everything that's appearing, So anything can happen and you as a perceiver just perceives. Condition1 : You are not only witness, you are creating what you are witnessing, In this case, Peace will express itself in the form and that form is completely shows your peaceful state of your being, If you are not in peace, then you would be creating the terrific situation in which you are in. Do you feel the difference? I do experience rollercoaster, few months my dominant feeling would be happy and other few months my dominant feeling would be unhappy and sometime the intense of my unhappiness would enter into suffering(because there is a need of avoiding), So I clearly see the unfolding story completely related to what I am right now or It defines me.
|
|
|
Post by Figgles on May 1, 2017 22:51:22 GMT
A little difference here, you are putting yourself in a position of witness, So anything could happen infront of your eyes but still you say you remain untouched, how? I don't understand! If somebody rapes a girl, your peace will not be distracted? No. You are misunderstanding. I have not said one remains 'untouched,' just that they do not get dragged off into the river of despair, where they lose sight of the perfection that lies fundamental to the entire play. I am aware that there are all sorts of horrific stuff that goes on in the world. But not liking those things, and envisioning something better does not equal getting dragged into suffering/despair. yes, I see the difference. But I'm not sure how that relates to what I was saying. & To say "I am creating what I am witnessing," is imo, not wholly wrong, but, a mixing of contexts. It really all depends upon what "you" is referencing. Yes, I know you do. My point was; Do you think others are lying or somehow mistaken, when they speak about an experience of emotional equanimity?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 2, 2017 17:38:52 GMT
A little difference here, you are putting yourself in a position of witness, So anything could happen infront of your eyes but still you say you remain untouched, how? I don't understand! If somebody rapes a girl, your peace will not be distracted? No. You are misunderstanding. I have not said one remains 'untouched,' just that they do not get dragged off into the river of despair, where they lose sight of the perfection that lies fundamental to the entire play. I am aware that there are all sorts of horrific stuff that goes on in the world. But not liking those things, and envisioning something better does not equal getting dragged into suffering/despair. yes, I see the difference. But I'm not sure how that relates to what I was saying. & To say "I am creating what I am witnessing," is imo, not wholly wrong, but, a mixing of contexts. It really all depends upon what "you" is referencing. Yes, I know you do. My point was; Do you think others are lying or somehow mistaken, when they speak about an experience of emotional equanimity? Both are one! They are not different, you are looking at what's happening and that unfolding story doesn't cause you suffering,right? I am only witnessing places you independent of situation or a kind of separate individual observing the objective outer world. I am witnessing what I am creating doesn't.
|
|
|
Post by Figgles on May 2, 2017 19:22:14 GMT
Both are one! They are not different, you are looking at what's happening and that unfolding story doesn't cause you suffering,right? It all depends upon how you define 'suffering.' For me there is a huge and important difference between a sense of irritation that might arise and then passes on through quickly, leaving no residual emotional discord in its wake, vs. a sense of irritation that arises and then deepens into abject anger, that lingers and festers into 'a problem.' That is the difference between one who is attached to ideas about how life should unfold, vs. one who is not.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 3, 2017 12:16:19 GMT
Both are one! They are not different, you are looking at what's happening and that unfolding story doesn't cause you suffering,right? It all depends upon how you define 'suffering.' For me there is a huge and important difference between a sense of irritation that might arise and then passes on through quickly, leaving no residual emotional discord in its wake, vs. a sense of irritation that arises and then deepens into abject anger, that lingers and festers into 'a problem.' That is the difference between one who is attached to ideas about how life should unfold, vs. one who is not. You said you are not dragged off into the happening, but I am asking how could you not moved when a little girl getting raped infront of your eyes? What would be your reaction in that case? How would you react If you directly witness the crucifixion? What would be your reaction? You would remain untouched? You would get irritated but will not be dragged into the situation?
|
|
|
Post by Figgles on May 3, 2017 15:45:00 GMT
It all depends upon how you define 'suffering.' For me there is a huge and important difference between a sense of irritation that might arise and then passes on through quickly, leaving no residual emotional discord in its wake, vs. a sense of irritation that arises and then deepens into abject anger, that lingers and festers into 'a problem.' That is the difference between one who is attached to ideas about how life should unfold, vs. one who is not. You said you are not dragged off into the happening, but I am asking how could you not moved when a little girl getting raped infront of your eyes? What would be your reaction in that case? How would you react If you directly witness the crucifixion? What would be your reaction? You would remain untouched? You would get irritated but will not be dragged into the situation? Of course I would be moved, and if there were anything within my power to do in that moment, I would absolutely intervene to try to stop it. My point is that there is a difference between feeling moved vs. becoming 'lost' to sense of wrongness. By "dragged off into the happening," I am referencing a 'getting lost to/swept up in' the negative emotions that arise in response to seeing something unwanted. When one gets lost/swept up, in the way I am referencing, he/she loses awareness of his divinity and the divine nature that is foundational to Life itself. That does not mean that one looks at rape to conclude it's a good thing, but rather, that in spite of such things as rape, and war, and all the other unwanted stuff, LIFE itself, is a good thing. What I am speaking of is the difference between an arising and then flowing through sense of wrongness, vs. an arising of anger that deepens into rage and then sits there, stuck, seething, brewing, festering. A form of anger might still arise, but it has no staying power when it arises from a foundational knowing that despite whatever may be appearing, Goodness/Light, underscores all of it.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 3, 2017 16:40:22 GMT
You said you are not dragged off into the happening, but I am asking how could you not moved when a little girl getting raped infront of your eyes? What would be your reaction in that case? How would you react If you directly witness the crucifixion? What would be your reaction? You would remain untouched? You would get irritated but will not be dragged into the situation? Of course I would be moved, and if there were anything within my power to do in that moment, I would absolutely intervene to try to stop it. My point is that there is a difference between feeling moved vs. becoming 'lost' to sense of wrongness. By "dragged off into the happening," I am referencing a 'getting lost to/swept up in' the negative emotions that arise in response to seeing something unwanted. When one gets lost/swept up, in the way I am referencing, he/she loses awareness of his divinity and the divine nature that is foundational to Life itself. That does not mean that one looks at rape to conclude it's a good thing, but rather, that in spite of such things as rape, and war, and all the other unwanted stuff, LIFE itself, is a good thing. What I am speaking of is the difference between an arising and then flowing through sense of wrongness, vs. an arising of anger that deepens into rage and then sits there, stuck, seething, brewing, festering. A form of anger might still arise, but it has no staying power when it arises from a foundational knowing that despite whatever may be appearing, Goodness/Light, underscores all of it. I don't believe peace that is not related to the form is a real peace. Form must be the result of your realization of peace! You say anger can arises, but anger itself is the resistance to the flow. Something should not have happened. But you agree with me that you are witnessing consciousness, If you are witnessing consciousness then your truth must be one with what you are experiencing, Reality has to be created in such a way that it has to be witnessed, it should not be created in such a way that you have to be resisting.
|
|
|
Post by Figgles on May 3, 2017 21:20:21 GMT
Of course I would be moved, and if there were anything within my power to do in that moment, I would absolutely intervene to try to stop it. My point is that there is a difference between feeling moved vs. becoming 'lost' to sense of wrongness. By "dragged off into the happening," I am referencing a 'getting lost to/swept up in' the negative emotions that arise in response to seeing something unwanted. When one gets lost/swept up, in the way I am referencing, he/she loses awareness of his divinity and the divine nature that is foundational to Life itself. That does not mean that one looks at rape to conclude it's a good thing, but rather, that in spite of such things as rape, and war, and all the other unwanted stuff, LIFE itself, is a good thing. What I am speaking of is the difference between an arising and then flowing through sense of wrongness, vs. an arising of anger that deepens into rage and then sits there, stuck, seething, brewing, festering. A form of anger might still arise, but it has no staying power when it arises from a foundational knowing that despite whatever may be appearing, Goodness/Light, underscores all of it. I don't believe peace that is not related to the form is a real peace. Form must be the result of your realization of peace! You say anger can arises, but anger itself is the resistance to the flow. Something should not have happened. But you agree with me that you are witnessing consciousness, If you are witnessing consciousness then your truth must be one with what you are experiencing, Reality has to be created in such a way that it has to be witnessed, it should not be created in such a way that you have to be resisting. I'm not sure I understand the bolded line. But, Yes, I agree, even a little bit of anger is evidence of a little bit of resistance. As I see it, because there will always be some degree of contrasting conditions inherent in experience, there will always be some degree of resistance. I don't see that as a problem though, nor do I see it as evidence that one is not really in peace. Peace that is tied to circumstances, is therefore, conditional, and actually a very flimsy sort of peace. Do you see a point one can arrive at, where nothing unwanted ever arises in experience?.....where every single thing that happens, is judged in form to be utterly and completely perfectly conforming to personal liking?.... Can experience ever become completely free of contrasting conditions?
|
|