|
Post by Figgles on Sept 22, 2018 16:59:51 GMT
How long do you consider to be prolonged? The way I see it is that some people (more than others) are living a deep lie, and are stuck in that lie. It is painful for them. Now, I embody freedom to a relatively great extent, I'm not even bound to the tyranny of mortgage, debt, possessions or job...which is quite rare where I come from. True freedom has nothing to do with whether or not you have a mortgage, possessions or job. You've simply vilified the stuff you fear/have an aversion to or feel it out of reach for you. Sour grapes kinda thing. Freedom from the "tryranny" of owning a home quickly becomes the presence of a problem if suddenly there's no pet/house sitting gigs coming in, right? Again, truth/presence has nothing to do with whether one has a job or owns a house. You've equated your 'freedom' from material abundance, house, work, with presence. That's ridiculous. If you just get outta the way, and stop trying to control things, all of that takes care of itself. You really don't need to worry about dimming your light around animals so that they don't suffer when you leave their home. The world you are seeking for will only be realized when the one who strives to dim his light for the purpose of controlling what happens, gets seen through.
|
|
Andrew
Super Duper Senior Member
Posts: 8,345
|
Post by Andrew on Sept 22, 2018 17:05:13 GMT
How long do you consider to be prolonged? The way I see it is that some people (more than others) are living a deep lie, and are stuck in that lie. It is painful for them. Now, I embody freedom to a relatively great extent, I'm not even bound to the tyranny of mortgage, debt, possessions or job...which is quite rare where I come from. True freedom has nothing to do with whether or not you have a mortgage, possessions or job. You've simply vilified the stuff you fear/have an aversion to or feel it out of reach for you. Sour grapes kinda thing. Freedom from the "tryranny" of owning a home quickly becomes the presence of a problem if suddenly there's no pet/house sitting gigs coming in, right? Again, truth/presence has nothing to do with whether one has a job or owns a house. You've equated your 'freedom' from material abundance, house, work, with presence. That's ridiculous. If you just get outta the way, and stop trying to control things, all of that takes care of itself. You really don't need to worry about dimming your light around animals so that they don't suffer when you leave their home. The world you are seeking for will only be realized when the one who strives to dim his light for the purpose of controlling what happens, gets seen through. I used the word 'relative' for a reason, but actually, the lies of the world we live in do relate closely to the lie of who/what we are. Notice that I also said it happens without effort or volition. You see, you are handicapped by your reticence at knowing that there are other living, experiencing human beings. I have no such reticence. I know there are other living, experiencing human beings. As such, I am sensitive to them, and I take responsibility for how I relate to them. If I entertained the possibility that these 'figures' were borgs or apparitions or whatever you think they might be, then I probably would be less sensitive too.
|
|
|
Post by Figgles on Sept 22, 2018 17:12:30 GMT
True freedom has nothing to do with whether or not you have a mortgage, possessions or job. You've simply vilified the stuff you fear/have an aversion to or feel it out of reach for you. Sour grapes kinda thing. Freedom from the "tryranny" of owning a home quickly becomes the presence of a problem if suddenly there's no pet/house sitting gigs coming in, right? Again, truth/presence has nothing to do with whether one has a job or owns a house. You've equated your 'freedom' from material abundance, house, work, with presence. That's ridiculous. If you just get outta the way, and stop trying to control things, all of that takes care of itself. You really don't need to worry about dimming your light around animals so that they don't suffer when you leave their home. The world you are seeking for will only be realized when the one who strives to dim his light for the purpose of controlling what happens, gets seen through. I used the word 'relative' for a reason, but actually, the lies of the world we live in do relate closely to the lie of who/what we are. Notice that I also said it happens without effort or volition. You see, you are handicapped by your reticence at knowing that there are other living, experiencing human beings. I have no such reticence. I know there are other living, experiencing human beings. As such, I am sensitive to them, and I take responsibility for how I relate to them. If I entertained the possibility that these 'figures' were borgs or apparitions or whatever you think they might be, then I probably would be less sensitive too. Just because I see the inherent emptiness of the totality of the dream does not mean that I am insensitive to other apparently sentient beings. Yes Andrew, you are apparently SO sensitive to the feelings/experience of others that even in the face of you supposedly feeling bad about the plight of animals raised for meat-consumption, you admittedly go ahead and do it anyway. If I were truly as insensitive as you say, I too would be scorfing down beef burgers and BBQ's pork and such vs. a vegetarian diet. The reason I don't eat meat is because I very much care about the potential experience of the animals involved. My behaviors actually align with my values...even in the face of my clearly seeing that all experiential content is empty of Truth. Imagine that.
|
|
Andrew
Super Duper Senior Member
Posts: 8,345
|
Post by Andrew on Sept 22, 2018 17:18:44 GMT
I used the word 'relative' for a reason, but actually, the lies of the world we live in do relate closely to the lie of who/what we are. Notice that I also said it happens without effort or volition. You see, you are handicapped by your reticence at knowing that there are other living, experiencing human beings. I have no such reticence. I know there are other living, experiencing human beings. As such, I am sensitive to them, and I take responsibility for how I relate to them. If I entertained the possibility that these 'figures' were borgs or apparitions or whatever you think they might be, then I probably would be less sensitive too. Just because I see the inherent emptiness of the totality of the dream does not mean that I am insensitive to other apparently sentient beings. Yes Andrew, you are apparently SO sensitive to the feelings/experience of others that even in the face of you supposedly feeling bad about the plight of animals raised for meat-consumption, you admittedly go ahead and do it anyway. If I were truly as insensitive as you say, I too would be scorfing down beef burgers and BBQ's pork and such vs. a vegetarian diet. The reason I don't eat meat is because I very much care about the potential experience of the animals involved. My behaviors actually align with my values...even in the face of my clearly seeing that all experiential content is empty of Truth. Imagine that. Well, the fact that you are arguing with me on this point illustrates one of the problems of solipsism. If you don't accept that there are other experiencing human beings, it's obviously going to affect your sensitivity to them. Yes, I experience cognitive dissonance on some subjects, but there are two points here. First, it is currently impossible to live an absolutely lie free life, because the lie is all encompassing (however, I am relatively free from some of the big lies). Secondly, the direction I point towards is a higher density world, so even though I make choices that are sometimes hypocritical, I also trust the intuitive guidance of those choices.
|
|
|
Post by Figgles on Sept 22, 2018 17:41:20 GMT
Well, the fact that you are arguing with me on this point illustrates one of the problems of solipsism. If you don't accept that there are other experiencing human beings, it's obviously going to affect your sensitivity to them. you make it sound as though I go around 'refuting' the idea that others are experiencing. I don't. I accept what presents within experience at face value. It's just that I am well aware that it's all dream-stuff. Why do you believe that one becomes less sensitive to apparent sentience than certain known sentience? Clearly when it comes to animals, I am more sensitive to the idea of their pain/fear experience than you are. How do you explain that? I'd say a guy who is admittedly seeking for an outwardly more loving, caring, kinder world, where folks will behave in ways that reflect sensitivity to the sentience he says he knows exists in others, who still continues to eat the meat of slaughtered animals, even though he says it makes him feel bad, is telling himself an absolute whopper of a lie. If you yourself are unable/unwilling to put your taste for the meat of sentient beings on hold in the face of your supposed quest for greater sensitivity towards others, then how is it you see this new density world, actually coming to be? you're not following your intuitive guidance there, you're following your selfish taste for the flesh of sentient beings, who you say you know 'suffer.' ..and you even admit that you're not comfy with doing so. That there, is what E means when he talks about 'split mind.' It's really very easy these days to eat vegan....if you care as much as you say you do, your desires for the flesh of sentient animals would eventually shift to align with your said values. It's pretty cool actually how that happens. You're lying to yourself big time.
|
|
Andrew
Super Duper Senior Member
Posts: 8,345
|
Post by Andrew on Sept 22, 2018 17:53:19 GMT
Well, the fact that you are arguing with me on this point illustrates one of the problems of solipsism. If you don't accept that there are other experiencing human beings, it's obviously going to affect your sensitivity to them. you make it sound as though I go around 'refuting' the idea that others are experiencing. I don't. I accept what presents within experience at face value. It's just that I am well aware that it's all dream-stuff. Why do you believe that one becomes less sensitive to apparent sentience than certain known sentience? Clearly when it comes to animals, I am more sensitive to the idea of their pain/fear experience than you are. How do you explain that? I'd say a guy who is admittedly seeking for an outwardly more loving, caring, kinder world, where folks will behave in ways that reflect sensitivity to the sentience he says he knows exists in others, who still continues to eat the meat of slaughtered animals, even though he says it makes him feel bad, is telling himself an absolute whopper of a lie. If you yourself are unable/unwilling to put your taste for the meat of sentient beings on hold in the face of your supposed quest for greater sensitivity towards others, then how is it you see this new density world, actually coming to be? you're not following your intuitive guidance there, you're following your selfish taste for the flesh of sentient beings, who you say you know 'suffer.' ..and you even admit that you're not comfy with doing so. That there, is what E means when he talks about 'split mind.' It's really very easy these days to eat vegan....if you care as much as you say you do, your desires for the flesh of sentient animals would eventually shift to align with your said values. It's pretty cool actually how that happens. You're lying to yourself big time. If you accepted your present moment experience, you would know that there are human experiencers. There could be many reasons for your food choices, you might have a point to prove about your solipsist sensitivity for example. When I say 'I experience cognitive dissonance', I mean that I'm not wholly comfortable with eating commodified animals. Equally, I'm not wholly comfortable with eating commodified vegetables! But my intuitive guidance at the moment is to eat both, and so I trust that. I was vegetarian for several years and trusted my intuitive guidance on that too. And at this point, following intuitive guidance is not a volitionary choice.
|
|
|
Post by Figgles on Sept 22, 2018 18:51:04 GMT
If you accepted your present moment experience, you would know that there are human experiencers. Accepting present moment experience does not equal knowing stuff about what appears beyond 'that' it appears. I've told you the reason; I am sensitive to the apparent sentience in animals.....the idea of animals experiencing fear and pain for something as insignificant as a taste preferences, doesn't sit well with me so I behave accordingly. Does your discomfort with eating animals have anything at all to do with their apparent fear/pain during the process of coming to your plate? If so, how can you (a dude who says he highly values caring, kindness, compassion) feel even a little bit ok with it? Following a vegan diet when your values align with that, is actually very easy these days. I agree, there are certain areas where it might be difficult to align behavior with values, due to various logistics, etc, that become difficult to escape/overcome, but this really is not one of them. I find it interesting that you have greater discomfort over the idea of other humans owning homes than you do about yourself consuming what you say you know with certainty to be, slaughtered 'sentient beings'. Seems you give yourself a pass on many issues, this issue of diet for sure, but very easily point your finger outwards at all the awful stuff you see others committing. How can you expect others to rise to the idea of your utopic world if you yourself can't even find alignment/congruence between what you say you value (your talk) and what you do (your walk)? Your point was that my absence of certain knowledge about others being sentient/experiencers (My Solipsism as you call it) must surely result in my being less sensitive towards others than one who knows. But right here, we have a case where I am clearly 'more' sensitive in an expressive way, to the apparent plight of sentient beings than you are. Go figure.
|
|
Andrew
Super Duper Senior Member
Posts: 8,345
|
Post by Andrew on Sept 22, 2018 19:04:28 GMT
If you accepted your present moment experience, you would know that there are human experiencers. Accepting present moment experience does not equal knowing stuff about what appears beyond 'that' it appears. I've told you the reason; I am sensitive to the apparent sentience in animals.....the idea of animals experiencing fear and pain for something as insignificant as a taste preferences, doesn't sit well with me so I behave accordingly. Does your discomfort with eating animals have anything at all to do with their apparent fear/pain during the process of coming to your plate? If so, how can you (a dude who says he highly values caring, kindness, compassion) feel even a little bit ok with it? Following a vegan diet when your values align with that, is actually very easy these days. I agree, there are certain areas where it might be difficult to align behavior with values, due to various logistics, etc, that become difficult to escape/overcome, but this really is not one of them. I find it interesting that you have greater discomfort over the idea of other humans owning homes than you do about yourself consuming what you say you know with certainty to be, slaughtered 'sentient beings'. Seems you give yourself a pass on many issues, this issue of diet for sure, but very easily point your finger outwards at all the awful stuff you see others committing. How can you expect others to rise to the idea of your utopic world if you yourself can't even find alignment/congruence between what you say you value (your talk) and what you do (your walk)? Your point was that my absence of certain knowledge about others being sentient/experiencers (My Solipsism as you call it) must surely result in my being less sensitive towards others than one who knows. But right here, we have a case where I am clearly 'more' sensitive in an expressive way, to the apparent plight of sentient beings than you are. Go figure. If you experience a dog as sentient and alive (which you do, if you experience a 'dog'), then you know in that moment that it is sentient and alive. A knowing may be incorrect, but it is still a knowing. Why would I accept your explanation as to why you are vegan? I don't ask you those kinds of questions because I don't trust the veracity of your answers. I don't have greater discomfort over folks owning homes than I do animals/vegetables being commodified. All commodification is tyranny, and is based in a lie. I've already explained why I am a 'bit okay' with what I do. I trust intuitive guidance, and rationally I also understand that almost every action (perhaps even every action) we take, is a lie in the world we live. I point stuff out about the world to people like yourself not with the intention of making you feel bad (though it is appropriate for all of us to feel bad about some of the choices we make), but because I believe it's useful to be aware of the lies. At this point in time, the lies cannot be wholly avoided, but understanding them is a good first step.
|
|
|
Post by Figgles on Sept 22, 2018 19:13:38 GMT
If you experience a dog as sentient and alive (which you do, if you experience a 'dog'), then you know in that moment that it is sentient and alive. A knowing may be incorrect, but it is still a knowing. There is a realization that illuminates all relative knowledge as empty. Following that, your entire relationship with relative knowledge changes....you see that you actually don't know shit. It's a larger, more encompassing seeing that encompasses relative knowledge. Relative knowledge loses any and all substance it had previously, before the realization. You actually think I'm lying about the fact that my food choices are informed by my values...by my compassion for animals? There are much bigger lies to see through than the story-based ones you are so intently focused upon. Your caught up in the story of a world gone bad. That world itself, is a lie.
|
|
Andrew
Super Duper Senior Member
Posts: 8,345
|
Post by Andrew on Sept 22, 2018 19:24:11 GMT
If you experience a dog as sentient and alive (which you do, if you experience a 'dog'), then you know in that moment that it is sentient and alive. A knowing may be incorrect, but it is still a knowing. There is a realization that illuminates all relative knowledge as empty. Following that, your entire relationship with relative knowledge changes....you see that you actually don't know shit. It's a larger, more encompassing seeing that encompasses relative knowledge. Relative knowledge loses any and all substance it had previously, before the realization. You actually think I'm lying about the fact that my food choices are informed by my values...by my compassion for animals? There are much bigger lies to see through than the story-based ones you are so intently focused upon. Your caught up in the story of a world gone bad. That world itself, is a lie. All knowings collapse into the unknown, yes. Have I not said that before??! Unfortunately, your own logical knowings about the dualistic relation between 'I and other' have not been challenged by you. There are many layers of lies, sure. This world hasn't 'gone bad', it's been a third density world, and perfectly so. A third density world by definition, will come with lies. It is our role to challenge the lies....not just the deep philosophical lies, but also the social-economic-institutional lies. The Abe-Hicks definition of 'economics' is wonderful.
|
|