Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 31, 2022 6:52:25 GMT
I've never said that Satchi is Figgles. How could the appearance of Satchi be anything else but you? Appearances appear to you and Satchi is one of those appearances so there is only you. Without you there are no appearances appearing to you so it's all you but somehow you are playing a game in which you appear to give your children food as if they need it. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 31, 2022 6:53:04 GMT
Okay so just get on with it. You know, your life. You're not even an appearance to me. you are just words flashing up on the screen. Figgles isn't even your real name. How's that for a dream? 😀 What makes you think Figgles is NOT "getting on with life"? Btw, words flashing on a screen, are "appearance." As is the experience of seeing them, reading them, interpreting them, etc. Every facet of experience = empty appearance. Yes that's what I'm saying. |
|
|
|
Post by Figgles on May 31, 2022 6:55:44 GMT
I've never said that Satchi is Figgles. How could the appearance of Satchi be anything else but you? Appearances appear to you and Satchi is one of those appearances so there is only you. The "me" is itself an appearance. Appearances, Figgles and Satchi appear within/to unbounded awareness. There is no "Me/person" in that. It's impersonal. You are clearly personalizing an impersonal unfolding...a dream arising to no-one/no-thing. |
|
|
|
Post by Figgles on May 31, 2022 6:56:26 GMT
What makes you think Figgles is NOT "getting on with life"? Btw, words flashing on a screen, are "appearance." As is the experience of seeing them, reading them, interpreting them, etc. Every facet of experience = empty appearance. Yes that's what I'm saying. So where do you see a someone who is NOT "getting on with life"? |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 31, 2022 6:58:32 GMT
How could the appearance of Satchi be anything else but you? Appearances appear to you and Satchi is one of those appearances so there is only you. The "me" is itself an appearance. Appearances, Figgles and Satchi appear within/to unbounded awareness. There is no "Me/person" in that. It's impersonal. You are clearly personalizing an impersonal unfolding...a dream arising to no-one/no-thing. What makes you think the you I am referring to is a person? |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 31, 2022 6:59:03 GMT
Yes that's what I'm saying. So where do you see a someone who is NOT "getting on with life"? Where. There is no one. There is just an appearance who is either not getting on with life or who is getting on with life. I'm just playing the same game as you apparently are and you don't even exist. |
|
|
|
Post by Figgles on May 31, 2022 7:01:21 GMT
The "me" is itself an appearance. Appearances, Figgles and Satchi appear within/to unbounded awareness. There is no "Me/person" in that. It's impersonal. You are clearly personalizing an impersonal unfolding...a dream arising to no-one/no-thing. What makes you think the you I am referring to is a person? The fact that you are referencing a "You/me" says it all. Ultimately, the dream is arising to no-one/no-thing. All "me/you's" are empty appearances only, arising within non-personal, unbounded, undifferentiated, awareness. |
|
|
|
Post by Figgles on May 31, 2022 7:02:37 GMT
So where do you see a someone who is NOT "getting on with life"? Where. There is no one. There is just an appearance who is either not getting on with life or who is getting on with life. I'm just playing the same game as you apparently are and you don't even exist. So there was nothing appearing that looked like a failure to get on with life? |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 31, 2022 7:02:42 GMT
What makes you think the you I am referring to is a person? The fact that you are referencing a "You/me" says it all. Ultimately, the dream is arising to no-one/no-thing. All "me/you's" are empty appearances only, arising within non-personal, unbounded, undifferentiated, awareness. What word would you like me to use for you? |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 31, 2022 7:04:06 GMT
Where. There is no one. There is just an appearance who is either not getting on with life or who is getting on with life. I'm just playing the same game as you apparently are and you don't even exist. So there was nothing appearing that looked like a failure to get on with life? Is that the same nothing that appears to be posting these posts under the name figgles? |
|
