Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 21, 2017 19:22:52 GMT
Peace isn't a quality of the heart? The heart feels. Yeah, it just seems silly to me to try to separate out Peace from feeling. Absent feeling/experiencing, why would we even be mentioning it? Feeling peaceful is not peace. Peace must be absence of suffering. There is a great difference. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 21, 2017 19:23:23 GMT
The sequence of Being>Feeling>Thinking would result in successful action or Doing. If our thoughts are based on genuine feelings that spring from our deepest Being, then the outcome of the process, the actions we take as a result, will be successful. If one percent of the world's population got onboard with this, the one percent being the critical mass, then what you've described will change. Pass it on.... task is to not to change the world, Our task is to change our personal universe through clarity. Who is "our"? You, and who else? If I may humbly ask... |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 21, 2017 19:24:39 GMT
The sequence of Being>Feeling>Thinking would result in successful action or Doing. If our thoughts are based on genuine feelings that spring from our deepest Being, then the outcome of the process, the actions we take as a result, will be successful. If one percent of the world's population got onboard with this, the one percent being the critical mass, then what you've described will change. Pass it on.... Likes same post twice.  Style of pilgrims |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 21, 2017 19:25:03 GMT
Likes same post twice. I kinda miss, dusty. Maybe one day he'll just show up. He is here with other name. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 21, 2017 19:27:22 GMT
Our task is to not to change the world, Our task is to change our personal universe through clarity. Who is "our"? You, and who else? If I may humbly ask... I was talking in a general sense. I am talking about each individual. Our task is not to find the peace in country, but peace in home. That means, we need to create the peaceful personal world for us not for the world. Your focus of world comes under your influence not others. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 21, 2017 19:28:30 GMT
The sequence of Being>Feeling>Thinking would result in successful action or Doing. If our thoughts are based on genuine feelings that spring from our deepest Being, then the outcome of the process, the actions we take as a result, will be successful. If one percent of the world's population got onboard with this, the one percent being the critical mass, then what you've described will change. Pass it on.... Our task is to not to change the world, Our task is to change our personal universe through clarity. If we are not in the world, the world is in us, then..... Being Feeling Thinking Doing Accommodates that clarity you're describing.  |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 21, 2017 19:30:17 GMT
I kinda miss, dusty. Maybe one day he'll just show up. He is here with other name. I'm somehow sensing that. Something compelled me to write it... |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 21, 2017 19:44:43 GMT
Our task is to not to change the world, Our task is to change our personal universe through clarity. If we are not in the world, the world is in us, then..... Being Feeling Thinking Doing Accommodates that clarity you're describing. There is nothing wrong with wanting to change the world for the better through being peaceful, at ease and as content and happy as possible, while still seeing, knowing and sharing the worries and sorrows of others, who are not as lucky and free from physical hard-ship as oneself might be. Would "changing our personal universe through clarity" also change the outer world for the better for those who still suffer from all kinds of unwanted circumstances? Or would that require real action in the real world? Serious question. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 21, 2017 19:54:49 GMT
Who is "our"? You, and who else? If I may humbly ask... I was talking in a general sense. I am talking about each individual. Our task is not to find the peace in country, but peace in home. That means, we need to create the peaceful personal world for us not for the world. Your focus of world comes under your influence not others. I think it's the other way around. We create a peaceful personal world for the world to be at peace and then, by that, we, as part of the world, are at peace too. But maybe I'm just spoiled by the concept/idea of seva, selfless service. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 21, 2017 19:59:55 GMT
If we are not in the world, the world is in us, then..... Being Feeling Thinking Doing Accommodates that clarity you're describing. There is nothing wrong with wanting to change the world for the better through being peaceful, at ease and as content and happy as possible, while still seeing, knowing and sharing the worries and sorros of others, who are not as lucky and free from physical hard-ship as oneself might be. Would "changing our personal universe through clarity" also change the outer world for the better for those who still suffer from all kinds of unwanted circumstances? Or would that require real action in the real world? Serious question. Real action in the world? Absolutely!!! The quality of our Being definitely determines the quality of our action(s). I most certainly relate to and engage with the immediate, and expanded environment in a completely different manner than in the past. Reverence is uppermost in mind. A much deeper appreciation as a result. |
|
