Enigma's Take on Happiness

You asked why it is that we can fly in our dreams if we fear gravity going unstable. I'm saying they are toadally different experiences.  

THIS activity be ego-drama enigma. 
Christians use ego to have others(such as spiritual folk) banned from spiritual websites, by whinging and complaining to the stall holder. 
Appearing RIGHT has nothing at all to do with ones spirituality BUT everything to do with Religion.

Ask yourself, "Are you here to learn or Teach?"

When we are challenged we ought to take-it to Heart and then express our response having first taken the time to savor the others output.

When one is constantly right, they can fall prey to the quality of being morally right, or justifiable
in an effort to seduce who is left.

Yes, it seems to be. You see it always attracts the negative experience for ourselves(Atleast for me) opposite to good argument! Did you notice that?

You asked me whether I removed Alfio and Reefs completely from my experience. I said they would be pulled into my experience when they are needed, Do you remember I said that? They are exactly for that.

Read this over on ST, and felt compelled to comment;

A movement of experience that actually has one making radical changes in how they behave and thus, how they experience the world, is actually going to result in an overall shift in perceiving more of the ‘goodness’ of life.

If you truly shed the baggage, the skies are gonna clear and the sensed feeling of 'goodness' is going to shine through more of the time.

E draws stark lines of division between what he calls ‘peace’ and what he calls ‘happiness,’ but the reality is, feelings of goodness, feeling of well being, pertain to both of those.

The distinction he should be emphasizing is that between ‘conditional happiness,’ happiness that is inextricably ‘tied to’ circumstance/experience, vs. happiness that arises independent of circumstance.

SR, if it means the end of the baggage that had one finding all sorts of fault with life, does indeed result in a greater sense that life in general is well and good, and that does translate into ‘feeling good,' more of the time.

It is only perpetual happiness that is tied to circumstance that is not possible, and the reason for that is that circumstances will never be purely, only ‘wanted’ in nature….there will always be some degree of circumstance arising/appearing that contains some degree of ‘not-liked’ stuff. It’s just the way this ‘world’ is wired. Contrast is part and parcel of the physical realm and it’s the movement between wanting/desiring and getting, that moves experience.

E says; “Peace is a very different animal,” and it’s really not, not in the way that counts anyway. Perpetual peace does mean that life is overall, more enjoyable…..that overall, there is a greater sense of feeling good and emotionally balanced more often than not.
But yes, it is different in the way that these good feelings are not ‘tied to’ what is happening in circumstance/appearance.

I would say the difference between peace and conditional happiness is not so much that one is felt and the other isn't, but rather, that in one case the good feeling is inextricably ‘tied to’ a particular circumstance that conforms to my preference, whereas, with “Peace” the felt sense of goodness, is simply, not tied to anything in particular. It arises freely and naturally in the absence of that which otherwise obscure it.