Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 16, 2021 9:39:39 GMT
Explain what you mean by "deliberately locked-down and suppressed". I'm curious to see if you understand what that implies.  Here, I'll demonstrate. So if you neither trust nor distrust the FBI then why are you so sure the FBI isn't crooked, is never dishonest and that Wray should be believed as some sort of authority figure? Do you know the guy personally, or somethin' like that? Maybe .. did you loan him $5 for a pizza and he paid you back the next Tuesday??  Why would something I said yesterday have any relevance today? If you have a question about a comment, ask then while it's fresh, not later after its been forgotten about Besides.. well, there are several besides here, if I felt like it, but I don't |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 16, 2021 9:52:45 GMT
Your demonstration was a dud.  .. nah, see, you exemplified what I was talkin' 'bout!  .. and thanks for the poem comment (** takes a bow **). Wait, wut, my answer *confirmed* what you knew all along? Nice system you got there, you must be right alot. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 16, 2021 17:23:46 GMT
or I could just say I don't know any G-Men personally and I'd prefer to keep it that way |
|
muttley
Super Duper Senior Member
Posts: 4,394
|
Post by muttley on Mar 17, 2021 2:00:36 GMT
.. nah, see, you exemplified what I was talkin' 'bout! .. and thanks for the poem comment (** takes a bow **). You just make it all up as you go along, don't ya? And within the confines of your own head I'm sure you think it all makes perfect sense.. Sorry, but no, and it only plays with the folks who use it for their own personal reasons.  Opportunity to point stuff out comes where it comes. You not answering those natural and fair questions isn't an example of a quiet mind, it's an example of deflection. It's not silence you're speaking, it's suppression. |
|
muttley
Super Duper Senior Member
Posts: 4,394
|
Post by muttley on Mar 17, 2021 2:03:41 GMT
Bad organizational DNA. The only reason it has the Gestapo/Stasi/KGB-like independence it has is because of Hoover blackmailing people. It was never reformed. This is the overactive problem-seeking suspicious mind talking Nah, it starts with WIBIGO, and there's an opinion on top of that. As far mind-noise, If that was overactive mind, then so was this. |
|
muttley
Super Duper Senior Member
Posts: 4,394
|
Post by muttley on Mar 17, 2021 2:11:34 GMT
Here, I'll demonstrate. So if you neither trust nor distrust the FBI then why are you so sure the FBI isn't crooked, is never dishonest and that Wray should be believed as some sort of authority figure? Do you know the guy personally, or somethin' like that? Maybe .. did you loan him $5 for a pizza and he paid you back the next Tuesday?? Why would something I said yesterday have any relevance today? If you have a question about a comment, ask then while it's fresh, not later after its been forgotten about Besides.. well, there are several besides here, if I felt like it, but I don't The relevance is that one of us has to keep your train of thought honest.  Referring back is just a natural flow in the dialog at this point, because you claimed that you neither trust nor distrust the FBI, but that essentially contradicts what you wrote previously (as linked).
Is Wray a neighbor? Did he return your lawnmower after he used it and bothered to clean the dogshit off the blade first?? |
|
muttley
Super Duper Senior Member
Posts: 4,394
|
Post by muttley on Mar 17, 2021 2:16:44 GMT
.. nah, see, you exemplified what I was talkin' 'bout! .. and thanks for the poem comment (** takes a bow **). Wait, wut, my answer *confirmed* what you knew all along? Nice system you got there, you must be right alot. Clever wordplay, but no, it "demonstrated" and "exemplified"  .. any "confirmation" is entirely secondary, and a very different meaning from "Confirmation Bias", which is just other people agreeing with your opinions. |
|
muttley
Super Duper Senior Member
Posts: 4,394
|
Post by muttley on Mar 17, 2021 2:21:26 GMT
or I could just say I don't know any G-Men personally and I'd prefer to keep it that way Ok, so if you don't know the guy why did you quote 'em? Just random?  |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 17, 2021 12:45:36 GMT
Wait, wut, my answer *confirmed* what you knew all along? Nice system you got there, you must be right alot. Clever wordplay, but no, it "demonstrated" and "exemplified" .. any "confirmation" is entirely secondary, and a very different meaning from "Confirmation Bias", which is just other people agreeing with your opinions. hehe, yeah I knew it was a stretch but clever didn't want to get bottled up by that minor restriction |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 17, 2021 12:55:21 GMT
or I could just say I don't know any G-Men personally and I'd prefer to keep it that way Ok, so if you don't know the guy why did you quote 'em? Just random? expert witness? a man in the know? who would you call to testify? some hot take blogger from the End Times Review? |
|
.. nah, see, you exemplified what I was talkin' 'bout! 
.. and thanks for the poem comment (** takes a bow **). 
Referring back is just a natural flow in the dialog at this point, because you claimed that