|
Post by Figgles on Feb 22, 2024 20:19:50 GMT
Yuppers....or even a 4 yr. old who had gotten caught up in the heady momentum of physically acting out in anger...
Even if/when the witness position has an imagined "me entity/object/someone/something" imagined along with it, it's still the perfect place to look "at" other mind-ego content that is no quite as good as that SVP, at hiding itself.
For anyone truly interested in looking 'at' mind content, it's gold...even IF tarnished by an imagined entity.
|
|
|
Post by Figgles on Apr 16, 2024 18:46:57 GMT
Becoming consciously aware as to mind's content really must be the first step in terms of "seeking for Truth."
If there's an absence of genuine interest in looking deeply and critically towards mind's most sacred of ideas, then the required sincerity is plain and simply not there.
Seeking that has sincere, genuine interest inherent to it, that includes and embraces the possibility of loss of that which presently provides comfort, is heading in the "right" direction...seeking that is devoid of that, is really nothing more than spinning the wheels of self-betterment, which is fine, but it's important to see the difference between the two.
A sincere interest towards Truth embraces Truth at all costs, even IF that means losing something that is experientially comforting. Anytime we have folks refusing to continue along with a convo where there views are being civilly, directly challenged, it's crystal clear that "fear" has risen up and if there ever actually was sincerity there, it is no longer in play. That moment of "cut and run and hide/shut down the convo," means ego/mind has won again.
|
|