Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 25, 2020 16:18:32 GMT
Appearances are appearing to be possessed with certain characteristic and expression happens accordingly, that's what I meant. The "appearance" of possession with certain characteristics, is itself, just an expression/appearance. One expression does not "cause" another. They are both facets of an encompassing, singular, undivided, movement/expression. If you are the only individual, then you are creating those characteristics, so you are stamping them.
|
|
|
Post by Figgles on Aug 25, 2020 19:06:49 GMT
The "appearance" of possession with certain characteristics, is itself, just an expression/appearance. One expression does not "cause" another. They are both facets of an encompassing, singular, undivided, movement/expression. If you are the only individual, then you are creating those characteristics, so you are stamping them. The Figgles individual is not a creator/catalyst, it's an appearance only. Appearances don't create or stamp, or in any way cause the ensuing/unfolding story.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 25, 2020 19:39:27 GMT
If you are the only individual, then you are creating those characteristics, so you are stamping them. The Figgles individual is not a creator/catalyst, it's an appearance only. Appearances don't create or stamp, or in any way cause the ensuing/unfolding story.
|
|
|
Post by Figgles on Oct 1, 2020 22:01:49 GMT
I don' think you have any grasp at all upon what Niz means when he speaks of 'going beyond mind.' It doesn't mean an expanded understanding based upon an expanded knowledge base...it means seeing material/conceptual knowledge/understanding for what it is...seeing through all conceptual ideas about 'what's going on.'
You say you 'live through the mind as little as possible.' Once again, you demonstrate with all you are saying there, that you have no reference for what is meant by that.
Your entire approach...your eschewing of nonduality, of what you think is meant by 'freedom/peace' in favor of conceputual understanding/knowledge about the universe and your place in it, IS mind spinning it's spin. The entirety of that which you are interested in knowing about, is based upon a fundamental misconception.
You know a lot... WAY too much already!....your knowledge that there is in fact absolute knowledge to be gleaned about 'your place in the universe,' that there is in fact an exterior world that can be known about, those are knowings that the liberated are no longer carting around as Truths.
|
|
|
Post by Figgles on Oct 5, 2020 16:40:55 GMT
As your version of 'inquiry and surrender,' hinge upon the presence of a someone who does stuff, what you're advocating here for the purpose of seeing through the imagined thinker of thought, is to further identify with the thinker of thought. It doesn't work. There is no path/process that guarantees the seeing through/realization of no separation...no SVP.
Be honest that what you are really selling is not actual liberation from the person, but rather, an improved experience for the person.
|
|
|
Post by Figgles on Oct 18, 2020 0:44:14 GMT
Oh my...so clear! And her delivery is the epitome of simple....unconvoluted, unlike so many other nonduality messengers/teachers.
(Some nice pointers here on the whole time deal too Laffy).
|
|
|
Post by Figgles on Oct 18, 2020 0:47:27 GMT
I would kinda like to post these over on ST....seems most of the conversation there is no longer Truth/nonduality, but rather, psychology, philosophy, new age...strange how those with a past, seeming, very strong interest in 'what is not so,' Truth, are okay these days over there, talking entirely in the dream stuff. I think that might be why Reefs had a new interest in perhaps melding forums again...? Who knows.
|
|
|
Post by Figgles on Oct 18, 2020 0:55:08 GMT
|
|
Enigma
Super Duper Senior Member
Posts: 13,969
|
Post by Enigma on Oct 18, 2020 15:17:05 GMT
Oh my...so clear! And her delivery is the epitome of simple....unconvoluted, unlike so many other nonduality messengers/teachers. (Some nice pointers here on the whole time deal too Laffy). Very nice. She gets right to the heart of it. I tried to 'explain' how there is no past or future to Marie one time. It was actually pretty humorous.
|
|
|
Post by Figgles on Oct 18, 2020 18:45:41 GMT
Oh my...so clear! And her delivery is the epitome of simple....unconvoluted, unlike so many other nonduality messengers/teachers. (Some nice pointers here on the whole time deal too Laffy). Very nice. She gets right to the heart of it. I tried to 'explain' how there is no past or future to Marie one time. It was actually pretty humorous. video please! I recall waaaaay back on Pavlina, a link to an online radio show where you talked about Truth....as i recall, you also 'got right to the heart,' and had the most amazing 'radio voice'!!!
|
|