Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 11, 2018 17:37:31 GMT
Many of us here clearly aware of Law of attraction,this law states that like attracts like. People tend to use this law consciously to attract certain experience for themselves. When people try to use this Law, I would like to call that process as Reality Creation. There are various types of Reality creation is in the market, visualization, affirmation, passing subliminal message to subconsciousness and also few others. The mistake people are not realizing here is, It attract everything that you do, but we are mostly unconscious of that. For an example, when one comes to know similar feeling attracts the same feeling unto themselves, S/he tend to control that feelings to stop further attraction in his reality. But the mistake people do here becomes clearly unconscious, because the act you perform to control that feelings also would be attracted. So the entire situation(creates unpleasant feelings) which you want to control would fall on your lap for you to perform the control. So Nothing can be done by our conscious effort, only knowing or seeing collapse the illusion. After we came to know seeing collapse the illusion, we tend to find solution or deceived ourselves to be found something via clear seeing but what had just happened is mind formed conclusion, then we fall into another loop of seeking the answer!
|
|
|
Post by Figgles on Nov 11, 2018 21:21:24 GMT
Many of us here clearly aware of Law of attraction,this law states that like attracts like. People tend to use this law consciously to attract certain experience for themselves. When people try to use this Law, I would like to call that process as Reality Creation. There are various types of Reality creation is in the market, visualization, affirmation, passing subliminal message to subconsciousness and also few others. The mistake people are not realizing here is, It attract everything that you do, but we are mostly unconscious of that. To see and engage with this apparent 'attraction' between arising thoughts and arising manifestation, you must adopt a particular position from 'within' the dream. The transcendent view reveals so called 'attraction' to be just an appearance arising within the dream, not the actuality...not the Truth. Nothing arising within the dream actually is a catalyst or "magnet" to something else that arises in the dream. It just appears that way. Coherence, trajectory, synchronized happenings, similar themed happenings, appearing thoughts/beliefs that precede the manifestation of particular conditions, all appearances within the dream, None of it, indicative of transcendent Truth. I think we mostly agree here....? (other than the 'attracting' bit). A feeling of sorrow appears to 'attract' more feelings of sorrow, but nothing is really attracting. Creation is one unified movement that is not sourced from within the dream. So really, if a mistake is being made, it's in believing that something happening within the dream actually can be a creative catalyst/cause to something else happening within the dream. The act of trying to control feelings is part and parcel of the story of the separate personal me, who judges certain feelings to be good and other ones to be bad. You can't extricate the sense of needing to control feelings from that arising sense of separate personal me. The act of trying to control feelings doesn't actually 'cause' or 'attract' anything...it just appears that way....the sense of needing to control and the arising manifestation that appears to be in 'response' to that, are all just part and parcel of the one movement...the unfolding of the story of one who is fully immersed within/asleep to the story. Unpleasant feelings are part and parcel of unpleasant thoughts...two sides of the same coin... They go hand in hand. It's wrong to say that the thoughts are 'the cause/catalyst' to the feelings, although the experience is usually of the thought arising, the feeling following. IN Truth, they are inextricably tied together. But yes, the idea of 'trying to control' thought so as to prevent bad feelings, assumes the presence of a 'someone' who generates and controls thoughts. There is no such person/thing. I'm not entirely sure what you mean here, but if you are saying that the person cannot simply decide to collapse illusions and then make that happen, I agree.
|
|