SR & CC anyone?

Much like other specific seeings/realizations that hinge upon unknowing (no separation, absence of volition, no cause/effect, no path to SR) ensuing behavior, on the face of things, may not reveal the gravity of the shift that's taken place.

The important shifts after all, re: all of those, happen within. One who has seen through his previous knowing of separation, still engages with individuation, but he no longer takes it as evidence of fundamental separation...he now sees that the totality is One unified movement, no one thing 'separable' from the other, and yet, to observe one who has realized this, on the surface of things, not much will appear to have changed. He still does much of the same stuff...brushes his teeth...goes to work....eat, engages with other folks...etc. etc.

Likewise where volition is concerned. Choices and decisions continued to happen in experience and one looking on would probably not know that when Joe blow chooses a Victorian home to purchase over a Rancher, he does so in full understanding that he is not a separate doer/chooser....that that decision was part and parcel of a greater unfolding. That difference in seeing though, is quite monumental.

It's the same with the seeing that I don't actually know whether the appearing person is consciously aware/experiencing or not. On the surface, experiential side of things, not much changes. I continue to engage all appearing people according to what presents...I engage their apparent self awareness fully, but beyond the experience of that, it is clearly seen/understood that the totality of experience, the totality what appears, appearing people included, is empty of truth, thus, what appears to be, it just part and parcel of 'an unfolding story.' Not truth.

The ramifications of that knowing are more far reaching than just pertaining to a singular appearing 'thing,' rather, that absence of knowing as applied to the totality of what appears, makes for a blanketing absence of attachment/identification with experiential content/appearance, straight across the board. Engagement continues, attachment ceases. The ramifications of that cessation, are huge. We're talking freedom.

Yes indeed. And that 'wrong direction' includes CC experiences and the importance assigned to them. I think I'm gonna start calling CC's, "Cosmic Cake."

Much like other specific seeings/realizations that hinge upon unknowing (no separation, absence of volition, no cause/effect, no path to SR) ensuing behavior, on the face of things, may not reveal the gravity of the shift that's taken place.

The important shifts after all, re: all of those, happen within. One who has seen through his previous knowing of separation, still engages with individuation, but he no longer takes it as evidence of fundamental separation...he now sees that the totality is One unified movement, no one thing 'separable' from the other, and yet, to observe one who has realized this, on the surface of things, not much will appear to have changed. He still does much of the same stuff...brushes his teeth...goes to work....eat, engages with other folks...etc. etc.

Likewise where volition is concerned. Choices and decisions continued to happen in experience and one looking on would probably not know that when Joe blow chooses a Victorian home to purchase over a Rancher, he does so in full understanding that he is not a separate doer/chooser....that that decision was part and parcel of a greater unfolding. That difference in seeing though, is quite monumental.

It's the same with the seeing that I don't actually know whether the appearing person is consciously aware/experiencing or not. On the surface, experiential side of things, not much changes. I continue to engage all appearing people according to what presents...I engage their apparent self awareness fully, but beyond the experience of that, it is clearly seen/understood that the totality of experience, the totality what appears, appearing people included, is empty of truth, thus, what appears to be, it just part and parcel of 'an unfolding story.' Not truth.

The ramifications of that knowing are more far reaching than just pertaining to a singular appearing 'thing,' rather, that absence of knowing as applied to the totality of what appears, makes for a blanketing absence of attachment/identification with experiential content/appearance, straight across the board. Engagement continues, attachment ceases. The ramifications of that cessation, are huge. We're talking freedom.

Yes indeed. And that 'wrong direction' includes CC experiences and the importance assigned to them. I think I'm gonna start calling CC's, "Cosmic Cake."