Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 7, 2017 7:03:31 GMT
Anger can still arise, but it's shallow and lacking the conviction of belief that you've actually been done wrong, or that something is fundamentally not as it should be. It doesn't take hold, and arises and easily passes on through, because you never lose sight of the witness, the ground of being, the knowing of Self. Every people in this planet has always been in witnessing mode whether they are realizing or not. So the question is not about whether we are really witnessing the life, the question is about whether we are in witnessing mode. Awareness enters into actor mode when it believes itself into one of the character in the game, it just get back to it's witnessing mode once after the realization, So once after the the realization it should not create the reality in such a way that it will perform the actor mode. If it's performing some kind of actor mode, then it still hasn't seen the truth, agree? The question is whether we identify as the witness regardless of personal expression. |
|
|
|
Post by Figgles on Aug 7, 2017 7:06:12 GMT
Anger can still arise, but it's shallow and lacking the conviction of belief that you've actually been done wrong, or that something is fundamentally not as it should be. It doesn't take hold, and arises and easily passes on through, because you never lose sight of the witness, the ground of being, the knowing of Self. Every people in this planet has always been in witnessing mode whether they are realizing or not. So the question is not about whether we are really witnessing the life, the question is about whether we are in witnessing mode. Awareness enters into actor mode when it believes itself into one of the character in the game, it just get back to it's witnessing mode once after the realization, So once after the the realization it should not create the reality in such a way that it will perform the actor mode. If it's performing some kind of actor mode, then it still hasn't seen the truth, agree? After SR, one never falls back into believing he is (identifying with/as) a character in the story. That said, there is still interest in the story and interest even in the character, thus, engagement (absent attachment) still happens, and that's why sometimes one finds himself a bit angry...it's because he still cares about life enough to get somewhat drawn into the character and unfolding story. Getting drawn into the story though, does not mean becoming lost in it. |
|
|
|
Post by Figgles on Aug 7, 2017 7:08:22 GMT
Every people in this planet has always been in witnessing mode whether they are realizing or not. So the question is not about whether we are really witnessing the life, the question is about whether we are in witnessing mode. Awareness enters into actor mode when it believes itself into one of the character in the game, it just get back to it's witnessing mode once after the realization, So once after the the realization it should not create the reality in such a way that it will perform the actor mode. If it's performing some kind of actor mode, then it still hasn't seen the truth, agree? The question is whether we identify as the witness regardless of personal expression. I am thinking your elastic band explanation would work well here. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 7, 2017 7:10:19 GMT
When you get angry you enter into actor mode from witnessing mode, aren't you? When you suffer, you enter into actor mode from witnessing mode,aren't you? So if I'm laughing I'm in witness mode, but if I'm angry I'm in actor mode? Who made these rules? You are not resisting the life when you are laughing or in happy or when you are in unhappy, but when you get angry you are in resistance towards life or you want to change the reality, So anger is obviously resistance, so it's not placing you in witnessing mode. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 7, 2017 7:11:05 GMT
Every people in this planet has always been in witnessing mode whether they are realizing or not. So the question is not about whether we are really witnessing the life, the question is about whether we are in witnessing mode. Awareness enters into actor mode when it believes itself into one of the character in the game, it just get back to it's witnessing mode once after the realization, So once after the the realization it should not create the reality in such a way that it will perform the actor mode. If it's performing some kind of actor mode, then it still hasn't seen the truth, agree? The question is whether we identify as the witness regardless of personal expression. If we identify ourselves as witness, then why do anger arises? |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 7, 2017 7:12:58 GMT
The question is whether we identify as the witness regardless of personal expression. I am thinking your elastic band explanation would work well here. Synchronicity! I just had that same exact thought. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 7, 2017 7:17:06 GMT
So if I'm laughing I'm in witness mode, but if I'm angry I'm in actor mode? Who made these rules? You are not resisting the life when you are laughing or in happy or when you are in unhappy, but when you get angry you are in resistance towards life or you want to change the reality, So anger is obviously resistance, so it's not placing you in witnessing mode. On the face of it that seems like a reasonable point when you use anger as an example. But how about if I want to alleviate suffering? That too is resistance to what is. |
|
Andrew
Super Duper Senior Member
Posts: 8,345
|
Post by Andrew on Aug 7, 2017 9:08:21 GMT
G man, I read your original post. What is your ideal answer here? What would you like to be told? I'll make sure I tell you something different hehe. Okay than you A-man ! You give your answer, I am interested in yours. Okay, well....can you tell me what you mean by witnessing mode first? What is it? What characterizes it? |
|
Andrew
Super Duper Senior Member
Posts: 8,345
|
Post by Andrew on Aug 7, 2017 9:13:31 GMT
So if I'm laughing I'm in witness mode, but if I'm angry I'm in actor mode? Who made these rules? You are not resisting the life when you are laughing or in happy or when you are in unhappy, but when you get angry you are in resistance towards life or you want to change the reality, So anger is obviously resistance, so it's not placing you in witnessing mode. Okay, so witnessing mode is the same as absence of resistance mode, and resistance mode comes with anger. What is 'resistance' exactly? |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 7, 2017 9:20:18 GMT
Okay than you A-man ! You give your answer, I am interested in yours. Okay, well....can you tell me what you mean by witnessing mode first? What is it? What characterizes it? Okay, Can you please read this one where I explained, If you still can't able to understand please let me know. Anger can still arise, but it's shallow and lacking the conviction of belief that you've actually been done wrong, or that something is fundamentally not as it should be. It doesn't take hold, and arises and easily passes on through, because you never lose sight of the witness, the ground of being, the knowing of Self. Every people in this planet has always been in witnessing mode whether they are realizing or not. So the question is not about whether we are really witnessing the life, the question is about whether we are in witnessing mode. Awareness enters into actor mode when it believes itself into one of the character in the game, it just get back to it's witnessing mode once after the realization, So once after the realization it should not create the reality in such a way that it will perform the actor mode. If it's performing some kind of actor mode, then it still hasn't seen the truth, agree? |
|
