Enigma
Super Duper Senior Member
Posts: 13,969 
|
Post by Enigma on Jun 24, 2017 0:21:28 GMT
Anything said by any person can be categorized this way because it's coming from one of the view point of Impersonal Consciousness. But what's important is, careful observation. It's going to be interesting to see how you do your wedding vows on that basis  Congratulations by the way. I'm sure his vows will make it clear that he is the Ruler and his wife is there to play a role for him.  |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 24, 2017 1:57:59 GMT
Your explanation of enigma's belief is pure storytelling. There's nothing experiential in this. You can't trust your experience. Most of it is illusion. So some of it isn't. Which bit? |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 24, 2017 1:59:47 GMT
I have no understanding of this at all. As tenka would say, you can only be what you are. What's there to understand? How can you be SR if you do know the meaning of SR? Because it has no meaning. |
|
Enigma
Super Duper Senior Member
Posts: 13,969
|
Post by Enigma on Jun 24, 2017 2:35:25 GMT
You can't trust your experience. Most of it is illusion. So some of it isn't. Which bit? It's possible to see the world as it actually is, as illusions are created in the mind. If one is seeking to know the truth through his experience, there's likely a perceptual bias that will alter his interpretation of what is perceived, which then becomes a part of the experience. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 24, 2017 3:30:19 GMT
You can't trust your experience. Most of it is illusion. So some of it isn't. Which bit? It's not the experience that is an illusion, it's the interpretation. Experience really is made of the aggregates of reality and the senses. |
|
|
|
Post by gabbynonstop on Jun 24, 2017 3:51:33 GMT
So some of it isn't. Which bit? It's not the experience that is an illusion, it's the interpretation. Experience really is made of the aggregates of reality and the senses. Having swept things under the carpet, the mind holds them until the R-Soul erupts. In the case of enigmas... I echo Satchitananda's "which bit?"  |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 24, 2017 18:14:06 GMT
There is no impersonal and personal, when consciousness looks at a thought, it starts to believe itself to be a person and this particular view point has it's own preferences. So Consciousness is not personal it's Impersonal, when it starts to looks the perception, personal comes into view. Hencely, personal and impersonal. One consciousness is creating and perceiving, So I don't want to separate this as impersonal and personal. Impersonal itself is the actor! |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 24, 2017 18:16:04 GMT
Where do I go wrong? You are perceiving,right? You have identified yourself as person,right? Theo is angry about spiritual teachings that have failed him, and he's taken a cynical approach to all of it, which is fine as long as there is there is still the openness to the truth. If the truth is of no importance to him, that's a deal breaker in terms of discussion. yeah, I sense the same ! But I don't mistake him because I was there once! |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 24, 2017 18:18:10 GMT
It's going to be interesting to see how you do your wedding vows on that basis Congratulations by the way. I'm sure his vows will make it clear that he is the Ruler and his wife is there to play a role for him. Ruler! Ruler! Ruler! |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 24, 2017 18:18:56 GMT
What's there to understand? How can you be SR if you do know the meaning of SR? Because it has no meaning. SR is identification shift, are you aware of that? |
|
Congratulations by the way.
