Post by Figgles on Jun 15, 2022 20:39:53 GMT
Reefs: And yet they still can't heal cancer. Their idea of treatment is to burn or poison tissue or to just cut out entire body parts and then hope for the best and see what happens. While at the same time, naturopaths all over the world heal people's bodies by putting them on a fruit or juice diet or even let them fast for a certain period of time while the body regains its natural balance and starts regenerating damaged tissue. There's a lot of testimonies from people who had been declared terminally ill and given up by the medical system who sought a naturopath and then not only recovered but came out healthier, younger, more aware, mentally clear and more in love with life than ever before.
You see, we've had this discussion before about Morse. And that discussion didn't go well because it was a clash of worlds. I actually urged you to take a deeper look at this, at all the testimonies of people that support that perspective. He's got a long list of people that recovered after he put them on a fruit or juice diet, people with all kinds of ailment that are considered incurable by your 'trained professionals', all kinds of cancers, multiple sclerosis, diabetes, parkinsons, alzheimers and even some quadriplegics recovered fully. Of course, you can't just willy-nilly put people on a fast or juice diet. It has to be individually tailored to their situation. But the bottom line always is, a raw diet, especially fruit only, accelerates the recovery and regeneration process of tissue enormously.
You see, your 'trained professionals' live in an artificial, constructed world of bits and pieces and parts where they barely can make sense of how it all fits together. It's a very reductionist perspective of the world and life in general. So it's no wonder that they look at the human body the same way they would look at something artificial like a car. Only instead of fuel intake, they talk about calorie intake. Instead of replacing a fender, they talk about replacing a hip. So what naturopaths suggest, to just give the body the fuel it is built for and then leave it to itself and let nature do the work must sound like quackery, if not idiocy. I agree. From the perspective of your 'trained professionals', that cannot be. And yet it is happening left and right all the time and all over the world with people who stopped subscribing to such a narrow mindset, who were willing to try a different approach, either because it resonated with them or because it was their last option. And that approach is an organic approach. Then the body is not just a machine that needs regular check ups, maintenance and spare parts in order to replace what has broken down due to the daily wear and tear. Then the body is a living organism, that has its own intelligence and can take care of itself and repair itself if you only let it do what it is designed to do.
So these two perspectives are fundamentally different. They also look at what we call illness, sickness or a bodily condition very differently. To your 'trained professionals' the symptoms are the illness and they do their best to rid you of these symptoms. Once these symptoms disappear, you are considered healed, even if they have to cut out entire body parts to get there (insert facepalm). To the naturopath the symptoms are just symptoms of a body out of balance. Usually they call it a healing crisis. It's like when you clean up your room, open all the drawers and empty them out on the floor to sort out the things that are still useful and the things you can throw away. Your room will look temporarily like a mess. But once you've sorted it all out and put things back where they belong and took out the trash, your room looks like new again. So the main focus is to restore that balance and then the symptoms have to disappear automatically. So you could say the naturopath focuses on healing from the inside out, your 'trained professionals' from the outside inward.
Now, I suggest you watch the professor (the longer version I've linked above) and what she has to say about connective tissue, inflammation and cancer and stretching and how it all fits together. It will give you an idea of the mindset of the naturopaths and - if you add the lymphatic system and the advantages of a predominantly alkaline diet - it will, IMO, explain rather scientifically sound why they are able to regenerate tissue and heal people, all the while your 'trained professionals' still can't.
So keep an open mind, and don't just dismiss new approaches to life and health as nonsense because it boggles your personal mind or contradicts what you have been indoctrinated with or what the current scientific dogma is. Instead look at the evidence. Follow the long trail of testimonies. Morse alone has several new testimonies every week from people he treats at his clinic or from people who followed his advice and write to him with before/after stories/pictures.
You see, we've had this discussion before about Morse. And that discussion didn't go well because it was a clash of worlds. I actually urged you to take a deeper look at this, at all the testimonies of people that support that perspective. He's got a long list of people that recovered after he put them on a fruit or juice diet, people with all kinds of ailment that are considered incurable by your 'trained professionals', all kinds of cancers, multiple sclerosis, diabetes, parkinsons, alzheimers and even some quadriplegics recovered fully. Of course, you can't just willy-nilly put people on a fast or juice diet. It has to be individually tailored to their situation. But the bottom line always is, a raw diet, especially fruit only, accelerates the recovery and regeneration process of tissue enormously.
You see, your 'trained professionals' live in an artificial, constructed world of bits and pieces and parts where they barely can make sense of how it all fits together. It's a very reductionist perspective of the world and life in general. So it's no wonder that they look at the human body the same way they would look at something artificial like a car. Only instead of fuel intake, they talk about calorie intake. Instead of replacing a fender, they talk about replacing a hip. So what naturopaths suggest, to just give the body the fuel it is built for and then leave it to itself and let nature do the work must sound like quackery, if not idiocy. I agree. From the perspective of your 'trained professionals', that cannot be. And yet it is happening left and right all the time and all over the world with people who stopped subscribing to such a narrow mindset, who were willing to try a different approach, either because it resonated with them or because it was their last option. And that approach is an organic approach. Then the body is not just a machine that needs regular check ups, maintenance and spare parts in order to replace what has broken down due to the daily wear and tear. Then the body is a living organism, that has its own intelligence and can take care of itself and repair itself if you only let it do what it is designed to do.
So these two perspectives are fundamentally different. They also look at what we call illness, sickness or a bodily condition very differently. To your 'trained professionals' the symptoms are the illness and they do their best to rid you of these symptoms. Once these symptoms disappear, you are considered healed, even if they have to cut out entire body parts to get there (insert facepalm). To the naturopath the symptoms are just symptoms of a body out of balance. Usually they call it a healing crisis. It's like when you clean up your room, open all the drawers and empty them out on the floor to sort out the things that are still useful and the things you can throw away. Your room will look temporarily like a mess. But once you've sorted it all out and put things back where they belong and took out the trash, your room looks like new again. So the main focus is to restore that balance and then the symptoms have to disappear automatically. So you could say the naturopath focuses on healing from the inside out, your 'trained professionals' from the outside inward.
Now, I suggest you watch the professor (the longer version I've linked above) and what she has to say about connective tissue, inflammation and cancer and stretching and how it all fits together. It will give you an idea of the mindset of the naturopaths and - if you add the lymphatic system and the advantages of a predominantly alkaline diet - it will, IMO, explain rather scientifically sound why they are able to regenerate tissue and heal people, all the while your 'trained professionals' still can't.
So keep an open mind, and don't just dismiss new approaches to life and health as nonsense because it boggles your personal mind or contradicts what you have been indoctrinated with or what the current scientific dogma is. Instead look at the evidence. Follow the long trail of testimonies. Morse alone has several new testimonies every week from people he treats at his clinic or from people who followed his advice and write to him with before/after stories/pictures.
I listened to the entire video about stretching and found it fascinating. I've being doing yoga since I was quite young...still continue today....it's an incredibly enjoyable form of exercise....it truly feels physically pleasurable as I move through the various moves and stretches.
That said, re: the bolded, relatively speaking, the two approaches are indeed like night and day, but "fundamentally" (if we're talking Truth...seeing from an impersonal perspective...from "beyond" the story/dream) there really is not fundamental difference between taking a pharmaceutical to try to cure an ailment vs. vita-mixing dandelions for your morning juice (which I do!
).....experientially, they are very different approaches, but when looked upon via an impersonal viewpoint, both are pandering to the idea of cause/effect within the dream....if/when healing happens, it really was not the applied medicine/technique/approach that caused it....in Truth, it's all one seamless movement...no causation within the dream. 
