|
Post by ghostofmuttley on Oct 27, 2021 3:34:31 GMT
Hey sis, I laughed at my false accusation almost as soon as it popped up. You're only impressed at my admission because it's a capacity that you'd can only to aspire to. Yes, I do recall that soon after making the "false accusation" you turned away from it....laughed about it. However, fact is, you initially, albeit for a very short time, went there in your mind before you apparently saw things differently. There IS a reason you went there in the first place...in that moment, and the ones up until you changed your mind, you obviusly thought I was capable of wanting/being interested in snooping into your PM's...and that it was a possibility my ethics were such that I might do such a thing. Again, you thought something shitty about me that you later somehow decided was not the case...I'm just asking that you approach the convo we're now having with that in mind. As far as your accusation that I can only aspire to the level of unabashed honesty that I'm applauding, all I can say is that you really don't know me. Those close to me would likely say I am honest/integral to a fault. Well, you have admitted to a change in perspective that you eventually came to in your dialogs over on st, but back then you very often directly contradicted yourself and even recently you persistently deflected after giraffing. It was my crash course in psychology. You state this positive self-image, but can you give one single example of ever admitting you were wrong in a dialog over here other than the aforementioned shift in perspective? I could link to several of mine - I screw up quite often. But I can produce the links because I don't argue with people about it when it's pointed out.
|
|
|
Post by Figgles on Oct 27, 2021 3:47:42 GMT
Yes, I do recall that soon after making the "false accusation" you turned away from it....laughed about it. However, fact is, you initially, albeit for a very short time, went there in your mind before you apparently saw things differently. There IS a reason you went there in the first place...in that moment, and the ones up until you changed your mind, you obviusly thought I was capable of wanting/being interested in snooping into your PM's...and that it was a possibility my ethics were such that I might do such a thing. Again, you thought something shitty about me that you later somehow decided was not the case...I'm just asking that you approach the convo we're now having with that in mind. As far as your accusation that I can only aspire to the level of unabashed honesty that I'm applauding, all I can say is that you really don't know me. Those close to me would likely say I am honest/integral to a fault. Well, you have admitted to a change in perspective that you eventually came to in your dialogs over on st, but back then you very often directly contradicted yourself and even recently you persistently deflected after giraffing. It was my crash course in psychology. You state this positive self-image, but can you give one single example of ever admitting you were wrong in a dialog over here other than the aforementioned shift in perspective? I could link to several of mine - I screw up quite often. But I can produce the links because I don't argue with people about it when it's pointed out. Being honest/integral does not mean saying I am wrong when I don't actually believe I am/was. I think you get quite riled when you disagree with another on forum and that's what leads to a lot of your projection and mis-characterizing of the other's message as well as his intent.
|
|
|
Post by ghostofmuttley on Oct 27, 2021 3:56:20 GMT
Well, you have admitted to a change in perspective that you eventually came to in your dialogs over on st, but back then you very often directly contradicted yourself and even recently you persistently deflected after giraffing. It was my crash course in psychology. You state this positive self-image, but can you give one single example of ever admitting you were wrong in a dialog over here other than the aforementioned shift in perspective? I could link to several of mine - I screw up quite often. But I can produce the links because I don't argue with people about it when it's pointed out. Being honest/integral does not mean saying I am wrong when I don't actually believe I am/was. I think you get quite riled when you disagree with another on forum and that's what leads to a lot of your projection and mis-characterizing of the other's message as well as his intent. tee hee says the gal who played the "deluded" card first for the umpteenthity time tonight. Notice how you can't produce the links of the times when you admitted you were wrong. You're like a warehouse full of projectors.
|
|
|
Post by ghostofmuttley on Oct 27, 2021 3:59:03 GMT
Being honest/integral does not mean saying I am wrong when I don't actually believe I am/was. The rarity with which you ever form such belief is what I was getting at. Sometimes back in the day it would get so ridiculously clear to others that I get these PM inbox floods.
|
|
|
Post by Figgles on Oct 27, 2021 4:58:23 GMT
Being honest/integral does not mean saying I am wrong when I don't actually believe I am/was. I think you get quite riled when you disagree with another on forum and that's what leads to a lot of your projection and mis-characterizing of the other's message as well as his intent. tee hee says the gal who played the "deluded" card first for the umpteenthity time tonight. Notice how you can't produce the links of the times when you admitted you were wrong. You're like a warehouse full of projectors. I've admitted to where I wasn't seeing clearly (&that's the term that applies to the convos, moreso than 'wrong')....actually, not so long ago at all (oct. 10/2021);
|
|
|
Post by Figgles on Oct 27, 2021 5:00:33 GMT
Being honest/integral does not mean saying I am wrong when I don't actually believe I am/was. The rarity with which you ever form such belief is what I was getting at. Sometimes back in the day it would get so ridiculously clear to others that I get these PM inbox floods. Oh...don't think you were the only one getting PM inbox infusions back in those days!
|
|
|
Post by ghostofmuttley on Oct 27, 2021 5:01:41 GMT
tee hee says the gal who played the "deluded" card first for the umpteenthity time tonight. Notice how you can't produce the links of the times when you admitted you were wrong. You're like a warehouse full of projectors. I've admitted to where I wasn't seeing clearly (&that's the term that applies to the convos, moreso than 'wrong')....actually, not so long ago at all (oct. 10/2021); Yes, i've already acknowledged that, but you even argued with me about that back in '16 as well, at the time, before you finally caved on it. It's one of two big admissions you've made, the other being about Trump. Here's some self-honesty for ya', what I was referring to in my own gaffes are all pretty much petty mind-hiccups.
|
|
|
Post by Figgles on Oct 27, 2021 5:02:27 GMT
Being honest/integral does not mean saying I am wrong when I don't actually believe I am/was. I think you get quite riled when you disagree with another on forum and that's what leads to a lot of your projection and mis-characterizing of the other's message as well as his intent. tee hee says the gal who played the "deluded" card first for the umpteenthity time tonight. Notice how you can't produce the links of the times when you admitted you were wrong. You're like a warehouse full of projectors. Seriously, is there a word you would find less personally offensive? lacking clarity perhaps...? I don't mind changing my language so what I am saying will be received better.
|
|
|
Post by ghostofmuttley on Oct 27, 2021 5:02:47 GMT
The rarity with which you ever form such belief is what I was getting at. Sometimes back in the day it would get so ridiculously clear to others that I get these PM inbox floods. Oh...don't think you were the only one getting PM inbox infusions back in those days! You giraffe less these days.
|
|
|
Post by Figgles on Oct 27, 2021 5:04:14 GMT
I've admitted to where I wasn't seeing clearly (&that's the term that applies to the convos, moreso than 'wrong')....actually, not so long ago at all (oct. 10/2021); Yes, i've already acknowledged that, but you even argued with me about that back in '16 as well, at the time, before you finally caved on it. It's one of two big admissions you've made, the other being about Trump. Here's some self-honesty for ya', what I was referring to in my own gaffes are all pretty much petty mind-hiccups. So I'm not sure what your point is...? That your self-honestly is 'better than' mine...?....different....smaller, more inconsequential, less...?.... What are you trying to say here?
|
|