|
Post by Krsnaraja on Apr 25, 2017 22:32:18 GMT
This is a very funny forum, indeed. I like it.
|
|
|
Post by andrew1 on Apr 26, 2017 23:41:23 GMT
For some reason I can only access the spiritual and non dual section as a guest. I even tried setting up a new account. I'm guessing it is basically because I am technologically challenged! Any ideas what's going on...what am I doing wrong?
|
|
|
Post by Figgles on Apr 27, 2017 1:06:35 GMT
For some reason I can only access the spiritual and non dual section as a guest. I even tried setting up a new account. I'm guessing it is basically because I am technologically challenged! Any ideas what's going on...what am I doing wrong? No...it must be something I've done (or not done!) in settings...will check into it asap! edit:I think I've got it fixed...lemme know if not.
|
|
|
Post by a on Apr 27, 2017 10:18:32 GMT
For some reason I can only access the spiritual and non dual section as a guest. I even tried setting up a new account. I'm guessing it is basically because I am technologically challenged! Any ideas what's going on...what am I doing wrong? Hi andrew I ran into the same thing yesterday which is why I posted as a guest in that section. Logged in I'm unable to see the spirituality and non duality board at all. Might be a glitch in site software. -ishimaru
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 27, 2017 10:23:23 GMT
For some reason I can only access the spiritual and non dual section as a guest. I even tried setting up a new account. I'm guessing it is basically because I am technologically challenged! Any ideas what's going on...what am I doing wrong? Hi andrew I ran into the same thing yesterday which is why I posted as a guest in that section. Logged in I'm unable to see the spirituality and non duality board at all. Might be a glitch in site software. -ishimaru Ah! Now I can see it while logged in. Cool
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 27, 2017 16:01:41 GMT
So I'm curious Gopal. when exactly did Reefs ban you? It looked to me like you chose to walk away. Did you leave and then come back after that...? Yes, he banned me because I opposed psycho Reefs! Psycho Reefs doesn't know what he does usually. He says "I will ban you, warning #1 Warning #2 warning #3 !
|
|
|
Post by Figgles on Apr 27, 2017 18:29:00 GMT
So I'm curious Gopal. when exactly did Reefs ban you? It looked to me like you chose to walk away. Did you leave and then come back after that...? Yes, he banned me because I opposed psycho Reefs! Psycho Reefs doesn't know what he does usually. He says "I will ban you, warning #1 Warning #2 warning #3 ! Oh...I didn't see that! Must have happened behind the scenes, kinda...? I will say that normally calling someone 'psycho,' would strike me as unnecessarily disparaging, but in this case, you are speaking about someone who has delivered his own share of deeply disparaging remarks over the years. Forums are places where it's pretty normal to expect folks to mirror back the behavior and tone of the other and if someone has made a habit of throwing first punches, as Reefs has, the judgements of those dealing with him are unlikely to be sugar coated. There does seem to be something really strange happening there. He's always been really mean-spirited and quick to lash out, but now he seems to have done a complete 180 degree turnaround with regards to some of his most deeply held opinions about forum behavior. In the past when someone would tell him his nastiness and mocking were not necessary, and/or they pointed out that one who mocks those who hold different opinions is absolutely identifying with 'personhood,' he countered that with jeers of "behaviorism and moralism,".... "Reefs: A relaxed 'live and let live' attitude would become you and your behaviorist cronies much better than this rigid 'my way or the highway' attitude. Just saying." "The humble business is for moralists. Just be yourself. Let it rip! " in fact if you do a search on either of those words on the ST forum, all sorts of posts come up, where Reefs is defending his right to treat others in a less than 'decent' way, just because they dare to hold a differing view. And really, I have nothing at all against someone dramatically shifting their position on such things, if in fact that's what's happened, but the fact that he did not at all explain that he has adopted a whole new outlook on things, oe explained why, or even how he sees his own past behavior that was in every way, counter to what he is now asking others for, is just imo, incredibly arrogant. He is now expecting others to tow the line and conform to behavior in a way that he himself laughed at in the past. & That he will not even let anyone question the stark divergence in his outlook on forum behavior now, vs. what it was just a month or so ago, really makes me wonder if he's even acknowledged that divergence to himself. There is simply no way he can stand by his words of the past regarding forum behavior AND stand by his current position without showing himself to be a huge hypocrite. I think that's why he gave me the warning and shut me down when I posted some past quotes of his that showed a diametrically opposite position to where he now stands. (Reefs: "If a community grows spontaneously then it has a solid basis. But if it is the brainchild of some utopist there's planning involved, protection, keeping out unwanted and that's a recipe for disaster…..") What is he doing by banning those who don't fit his idea of a good forum member, if not planning and keeping out unwanted people from the forum, so he can mold it to his own liking..? The whole thing is actually pretty strange. Anyway..haha...gag is off!....I had my rant. I think what happened is that You, I and a few others were challenging him in ways that he had no rebuttal to...ways that he had no issue with when the shoe was on the other foot, and he just got really angry and figured that becoming a mod was a good way to shut us all down, so he could feel okay again. Sort of like Donald Trump becoming President so he can slash corporate Taxes and save himself a bundle.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 27, 2017 18:58:19 GMT
Yes, he banned me because I opposed psycho Reefs! Psycho Reefs doesn't know what he does usually. He says "I will ban you, warning #1 Warning #2 warning #3 ! Oh...I didn't see that! Must have happened behind the scenes, kinda...? I will say that normally calling someone 'psycho,' would strike me as unnecessarily disparaging, but in this case, you are speaking about someone who has delivered his own share of deeply disparaging remarks over the years. Forums are places where it's pretty normal to expect folks to mirror back the behavior and tone of the other and if someone has made a habit of throwing first punches, as Reefs has, the judgements of those dealing with him are unlikely to be sugar coated. There does seem to be something really strange happening there. He's always been really mean-spirited and quick to lash out, but now he seems to have done a complete 180 degree turnaround with regards to some of his most deeply held opinions about forum behavior. In the past when someone would tell him his nastiness and mocking were not necessary, and/or they pointed out that one who mocks those who hold different opinions is absolutely identifying with 'personhood,' he countered that with jeers of "behaviorism and moralism,".... "Reefs: A relaxed 'live and let live' attitude would become you and your behaviorist cronies much better than this rigid 'my way or the highway' attitude. Just saying." "The humble business is for moralists. Just be yourself. Let it rip! " in fact if you do a search on either of those words on the ST forum, all sorts of posts come up, where Reefs is defending his right to treat others in a less than 'decent' way, just because they dare to hold a differing view. And really, I have nothing at all against someone dramatically shifting their position on such things, if in fact that's what's happened, but the fact that he did not at all explain that he has adopted a whole new outlook on things, oe explained why, or even how he sees his own past behavior that was in every way, counter to what he is now asking others for, is just imo, incredibly arrogant. He is now expecting others to tow the line and conform to behavior in a way that he himself laughed at in the past. & That he will not even let anyone question the stark divergence in his outlook on forum behavior now, vs. what it was just a month or so ago, really makes me wonder if he's even acknowledged that divergence to himself. There is simply no way he can stand by his words of the past regarding forum behavior AND stand by his current position without showing himself to be a huge hypocrite. I think that's why he gave me the warning and shut me down when I posted some past quotes of his that showed a diametrically opposite position to where he now stands. (Reefs: "If a community grows spontaneously then it has a solid basis. But if it is the brainchild of some utopist there's planning involved, protection, keeping out unwanted and that's a recipe for disaster…..") What is he doing by banning those who don't fit his idea of a good forum member, if not planning and keeping out unwanted people from the forum, so he can mold it to his own liking..? The whole thing is actually pretty strange. Anyway..haha...gag is off!....I had my rant. I think what happened is that You, I and a few others were challenging him in ways that he had no rebuttal to...ways that he had no issue with when the shoe was on the other foot, and he just got really angry and figured that becoming a mod was a good way to shut us all down, so he could feel okay again. Sort of like Donald Trump becoming President so he can slash corporate Taxes and save himself a bundle. Yes, I read your reply to him, He was not ready to face your questions, because he knows he said something opposite to what he was doing right now. In my view, he is completely mentally ill person. He is not even qualified to participate in any public forum, I have seen many thread which has been created by asking 'Reefs has to be banned or not', but ZD endorsed him to be a moderator! ZD really doesn't want any peace in my opinion, Forum was really in peace before Reefs was becoming a moderator but now clearly it's not, ZD enjoys this. All ZD want is, he has to perform some kind of teacher role, and I don't think he is free from anything but he talks of 1000 pages about SR and CC experience.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 27, 2017 19:12:01 GMT
Yes, he banned me because I opposed psycho Reefs! Psycho Reefs doesn't know what he does usually. He says "I will ban you, warning #1 Warning #2 warning #3 ! Oh...I didn't see that! Must have happened behind the scenes, kinda...? I will say that normally calling someone 'psycho,' would strike me as unnecessarily disparaging, but in this case, you are speaking about someone who has delivered his own share of deeply disparaging remarks over the years. Forums are places where it's pretty normal to expect folks to mirror back the behavior and tone of the other and if someone has made a habit of throwing first punches, as Reefs has, the judgements of those dealing with him are unlikely to be sugar coated. There does seem to be something really strange happening there. He's always been really mean-spirited and quick to lash out, but now he seems to have done a complete 180 degree turnaround with regards to some of his most deeply held opinions about forum behavior. In the past when someone would tell him his nastiness and mocking were not necessary, and/or they pointed out that one who mocks those who hold different opinions is absolutely identifying with 'personhood,' he countered that with jeers of "behaviorism and moralism,".... "Reefs: A relaxed 'live and let live' attitude would become you and your behaviorist cronies much better than this rigid 'my way or the highway' attitude. Just saying." "The humble business is for moralists. Just be yourself. Let it rip! " in fact if you do a search on either of those words on the ST forum, all sorts of posts come up, where Reefs is defending his right to treat others in a less than 'decent' way, just because they dare to hold a differing view. And really, I have nothing at all against someone dramatically shifting their position on such things, if in fact that's what's happened, but the fact that he did not at all explain that he has adopted a whole new outlook on things, oe explained why, or even how he sees his own past behavior that was in every way, counter to what he is now asking others for, is just imo, incredibly arrogant. He is now expecting others to tow the line and conform to behavior in a way that he himself laughed at in the past. & That he will not even let anyone question the stark divergence in his outlook on forum behavior now, vs. what it was just a month or so ago, really makes me wonder if he's even acknowledged that divergence to himself. There is simply no way he can stand by his words of the past regarding forum behavior AND stand by his current position without showing himself to be a huge hypocrite. I think that's why he gave me the warning and shut me down when I posted some past quotes of his that showed a diametrically opposite position to where he now stands. (Reefs: "If a community grows spontaneously then it has a solid basis. But if it is the brainchild of some utopist there's planning involved, protection, keeping out unwanted and that's a recipe for disaster…..") What is he doing by banning those who don't fit his idea of a good forum member, if not planning and keeping out unwanted people from the forum, so he can mold it to his own liking..? The whole thing is actually pretty strange. Anyway..haha...gag is off!....I had my rant. I think what happened is that You, I and a few others were challenging him in ways that he had no rebuttal to...ways that he had no issue with when the shoe was on the other foot, and he just got really angry and figured that becoming a mod was a good way to shut us all down, so he could feel okay again. Sort of like Donald Trump becoming President so he can slash corporate Taxes and save himself a bundle. Well expressed. I could have written parts of this while witnessing the changing of the guard there. It's all so unnecessary, which brings us to the third quality of awareness, and how it's almost non-existent over there.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 27, 2017 19:34:31 GMT
Oh...I didn't see that! Must have happened behind the scenes, kinda...? I will say that normally calling someone 'psycho,' would strike me as unnecessarily disparaging, but in this case, you are speaking about someone who has delivered his own share of deeply disparaging remarks over the years. Forums are places where it's pretty normal to expect folks to mirror back the behavior and tone of the other and if someone has made a habit of throwing first punches, as Reefs has, the judgements of those dealing with him are unlikely to be sugar coated. There does seem to be something really strange happening there. He's always been really mean-spirited and quick to lash out, but now he seems to have done a complete 180 degree turnaround with regards to some of his most deeply held opinions about forum behavior. In the past when someone would tell him his nastiness and mocking were not necessary, and/or they pointed out that one who mocks those who hold different opinions is absolutely identifying with 'personhood,' he countered that with jeers of "behaviorism and moralism,".... "Reefs: A relaxed 'live and let live' attitude would become you and your behaviorist cronies much better than this rigid 'my way or the highway' attitude. Just saying." "The humble business is for moralists. Just be yourself. Let it rip! " in fact if you do a search on either of those words on the ST forum, all sorts of posts come up, where Reefs is defending his right to treat others in a less than 'decent' way, just because they dare to hold a differing view. And really, I have nothing at all against someone dramatically shifting their position on such things, if in fact that's what's happened, but the fact that he did not at all explain that he has adopted a whole new outlook on things, oe explained why, or even how he sees his own past behavior that was in every way, counter to what he is now asking others for, is just imo, incredibly arrogant. He is now expecting others to tow the line and conform to behavior in a way that he himself laughed at in the past. & That he will not even let anyone question the stark divergence in his outlook on forum behavior now, vs. what it was just a month or so ago, really makes me wonder if he's even acknowledged that divergence to himself. There is simply no way he can stand by his words of the past regarding forum behavior AND stand by his current position without showing himself to be a huge hypocrite. I think that's why he gave me the warning and shut me down when I posted some past quotes of his that showed a diametrically opposite position to where he now stands. (Reefs: "If a community grows spontaneously then it has a solid basis. But if it is the brainchild of some utopist there's planning involved, protection, keeping out unwanted and that's a recipe for disaster…..") What is he doing by banning those who don't fit his idea of a good forum member, if not planning and keeping out unwanted people from the forum, so he can mold it to his own liking..? The whole thing is actually pretty strange. Anyway..haha...gag is off!....I had my rant. I think what happened is that You, I and a few others were challenging him in ways that he had no rebuttal to...ways that he had no issue with when the shoe was on the other foot, and he just got really angry and figured that becoming a mod was a good way to shut us all down, so he could feel okay again. Sort of like Donald Trump becoming President so he can slash corporate Taxes and save himself a bundle. Yes, I read your reply to him, He was not ready to face your questions, because he knows he said something opposite to what he was doing right now. In my view, he is completely mentally ill person. He is not even qualified to participate in any public forum, I have seen many thread which has been created by asking 'Reefs has to be banned or not', but ZD endorsed him to be a moderator! ZD really doesn't want any peace in my opinion, Forum was really in peace before Reefs was becoming a moderator but now clearly it's not, ZD enjoys this. All ZD want is, he has to perform some kind of teacher role, and I don't think he is free from anything but he talks of 1000 pages about SR and CC experience. I've been banned there more than you have. All I can surmise from that is the methodology/or criteria for banning is "time bound awareness is in the intellect. It calculates." Which explains the need for provocation on the mods part. Foolishness. There's another way to moderate. Timeless awareness. Being Feeling Thinking Doing They're omitting the Feeling aspect of awareness.
|
|